Will green finance promote green development: based on the threshold effect of R&D investment

被引:31
|
作者
Zhang, Jijian [1 ]
Li, Fengqin [1 ]
Ding, Xuhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green finance; Green development efficiency; R&D investment; Panel threshold model; ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION; DEVELOPMENT EFFICIENCY; ENERGY; CHINA; CREDIT; INDUSTRIES; IMPACT; POLICY; BELT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-20161-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Deeply understanding the driving effect of green finance on green development is of great significance to promote economic transformation and realize the long-term green development. This paper uses the entropy method and undesirable-SE-SBM model to measure provincial green finance and green development efficiency respectively from 2008 to 2018. And based on the above, the panel threshold model is constructed to discuss the nonlinear relationship between green finance and green development efficiency from the first empirical verification. The results show that (1) the impact of green finance on green development has a significant single threshold effect, only when R&D investment crosses 2.810 can green finance significantly promote green development efficiency, and before that, it will suppress green development efficiency. (2) At present, a few provinces in China have crossed the threshold value of R&D investment, only including Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai, while the R&D investment of Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, and Guangdong gradually approaches the threshold value. Therefore, improving the construction of the green financial system, correctly guiding the direction of green capital investment, and strengthening the supervision of environmental information disclosure are important.
引用
收藏
页码:60232 / 60243
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can intellectual property rights protection and governmental R&D investment promote Chinese enterprises' R&D investment?
    Li, Wei
    KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2017, 15 (04) : 551 - 559
  • [32] Will China's R&D investment improve green innovation performance? An empirical study
    Fan, Jundi
    Teo, Thompson
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (26) : 39331 - 39344
  • [33] R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: evidence from China
    Xu, Jian
    Liu, Feng
    Shang, Yue
    Kybernetes, 2023, 50 (03) : 737 - 756
  • [34] R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: evidence from China
    Xu, Jian
    Liu, Feng
    Shang, Yue
    KYBERNETES, 2021, 50 (03) : 737 - 756
  • [35] Game-Theoretic Analysis for Green R&D Investment Strategies in the Vehicle Market
    Yao, Zhanghao
    Cheng, Yukun
    Chen, Jinmian
    Cui, Xueli
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 40 (05)
  • [36] Role of green finance and investment in sustainable resource development in China
    Yang, Xiaoyun
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 86
  • [37] Can digital inclusive finance promote agricultural green development?
    Zhang, Wei
    Huang, Min
    Shen, Pengcheng
    Liu, Xuemeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023,
  • [38] Regulatory ‘Balancing’ and the Efficiency of Green R&D
    Anthony Heyes
    Catherine Liston-Heyes
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 9 (4) : 493 - 507
  • [39] Competitive Pressure and Diversification into Green R&D
    Tobias Stucki
    Martin Woerter
    Review of Industrial Organization, 2019, 55 : 301 - 325
  • [40] Green chemistry in pharmaceutical R&D in 2016
    Shuster, Leanna
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 252