Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species

被引:264
|
作者
Kosman, E [1 ]
Leonard, KJ
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, George S Wise Fac Life Sci, Inst Cereal Crops Improvement, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Plant Pathol, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
assignment problem; codominant markers; diversity; dominant markers; population genetics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02416.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Determining true genetic dissimilarity between individuals is an important and decisive point for clustering and analysing diversity within and among populations, because different dissimilarity indices may yield conflicting outcomes. We show that there are no acceptable universal approaches to assessing the dissimilarity between individuals with molecular markers. Different measures are relevant to dominant and codominant DNA markers depending on the ploidy of organisms. The Dice coefficient is the suitable measure for haploids with codominant markers and it can be applied directly to (0,1)-vectors representing banding profiles of individuals. None of the common measures, Dice, Jaccard, simple mismatch coefficient (or the squared Euclidean distance), is appropriate for diploids with codominant markers. By transforming multiallelic banding patterns at each locus into the corresponding homozygous or heterozygous states, a new measure of dissimilarity within locus was developed and expanded to assess dissimilarity between multilocus states of two individuals by averaging across all codorninant loci tested. There is no rigorous well-founded solution in the case of dominant markers. The simple mismatch coefficient is the most suitable measure of dissimilarity between banding patterns of closely related haploid forms. For distantly related haploid individuals, the Jaccard dissimilarity is recommended. In general, no suitable method for measuring genetic dissimilarity between diploids with dominant markers can be proposed. Banding patterns of diploids with dominant markers and poly-ploids with codominant markers represent individuals' phenotypes rather than genotypes. All dissimilarity measures proposed and developed herein are metrics.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 424
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genetic variability and phylogenetic relationships studies of genus Citrus L. with the application of molecular markers
    T. K. Hazarika
    B. N. Hazarika
    A. C. Shukla
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2014, 61 : 1441 - 1454
  • [22] Genetic variability and phylogenetic relationships studies of genus Citrus L. with the application of molecular markers
    Hazarika, T. K.
    Hazarika, B. N.
    Shukla, A. C.
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2014, 61 (08) : 1441 - 1454
  • [23] Natural hybridization between diploid crucian carp species and genetic independence of triploid crucian carp elucidated by DNA markers
    Ohara, K
    Ariyoshi, T
    Sumida, E
    Sitizyo, K
    Taniguchi, N
    ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 17 (03) : 357 - 364
  • [24] Diagnostic molecular markers and the genetic relationships among three species of the Cheilosia canicularis group (Diptera: Syrphidae)
    Milankov, V
    Stamenkovic, J
    Ludoski, J
    Stáhls, G
    Vujic, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2005, 102 (02) : 125 - 131
  • [25] Genetic variability and relationships between and within grape cultivated varieties and wild species based on SRAP markers
    Dalong Guo
    Junyu Zhang
    Chonghuai Liu
    Guohai Zhang
    Meng Li
    Qian Zhang
    Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2012, 8 : 789 - 800
  • [26] Assessment of Genetic Relationships between Wild and Cultivated Mulberry (Morus) Species using PCR Based Markers
    K. Vijayan
    A. Tikader
    P. K. Kar
    P. P. Srivastava
    A. K. Awasthi
    K. Thangavelu
    B. Saratchandra
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2006, 53 : 873 - 882
  • [27] Assessment of genetic relationships between wild and cultivated mulberry (Morus) species using PCR based markers
    Vijayan, K.
    Tikader, A.
    Kar, P. K.
    Srivastava, P. P.
    Awasthi, A. K.
    Thangavelu, K.
    Saratchandra, B.
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2006, 53 (05) : 873 - 882
  • [28] Genetic variability and relationships between and within grape cultivated varieties and wild species based on SRAP markers
    Guo, Dalong
    Zhang, Junyu
    Liu, Chonghuai
    Zhang, Guohai
    Li, Meng
    Zhang, Qian
    TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2012, 8 (04) : 789 - 800
  • [29] Molecular identification and genetic relationships among Alcea (Malvaceae) species by ISSR Markers: A high value medicinal plant
    Cheng, Jinxin
    Hu, Dingyu
    Liu, Yaran
    Zhang, Zetian
    Khayat-Nezhad, Majid
    CARYOLOGIA, 2021, 74 (03) : 65 - 75
  • [30] Genetic relationships between populations of Aegilops tauschii Coss. (Poaceae) using SCoT molecular markers
    Xia, Haiou
    Cheng, Tianyu
    Ma, Xin
    CARYOLOGIA, 2022, 75 (01) : 141 - 153