Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species

被引:264
|
作者
Kosman, E [1 ]
Leonard, KJ
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, George S Wise Fac Life Sci, Inst Cereal Crops Improvement, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Plant Pathol, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
assignment problem; codominant markers; diversity; dominant markers; population genetics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02416.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Determining true genetic dissimilarity between individuals is an important and decisive point for clustering and analysing diversity within and among populations, because different dissimilarity indices may yield conflicting outcomes. We show that there are no acceptable universal approaches to assessing the dissimilarity between individuals with molecular markers. Different measures are relevant to dominant and codominant DNA markers depending on the ploidy of organisms. The Dice coefficient is the suitable measure for haploids with codominant markers and it can be applied directly to (0,1)-vectors representing banding profiles of individuals. None of the common measures, Dice, Jaccard, simple mismatch coefficient (or the squared Euclidean distance), is appropriate for diploids with codominant markers. By transforming multiallelic banding patterns at each locus into the corresponding homozygous or heterozygous states, a new measure of dissimilarity within locus was developed and expanded to assess dissimilarity between multilocus states of two individuals by averaging across all codorninant loci tested. There is no rigorous well-founded solution in the case of dominant markers. The simple mismatch coefficient is the most suitable measure of dissimilarity between banding patterns of closely related haploid forms. For distantly related haploid individuals, the Jaccard dissimilarity is recommended. In general, no suitable method for measuring genetic dissimilarity between diploids with dominant markers can be proposed. Banding patterns of diploids with dominant markers and poly-ploids with codominant markers represent individuals' phenotypes rather than genotypes. All dissimilarity measures proposed and developed herein are metrics.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 424
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of three genetic similarity coefficients based on dominant markers from predominantly self-pollinating species
    Beharav, A.
    Maras, M.
    Kitner, M.
    Sustar-Vozlic, J.
    Sun, G. L.
    Dolezalova, I.
    Lebeda, A.
    Meglic, V.
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2010, 54 (01) : 54 - 60
  • [12] Identification and genetic relationships among nine Albizzia species based on morphological and molecular markers
    Aparajita, S.
    Senapati, S. K.
    Rout, G. R.
    PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 2008, 142 (01): : 30 - 39
  • [13] Assessment of genetic diversity and relationships among caladium cultivars and species using molecular markers
    Deng, Zhanao
    Goktepe, Fahrettin
    Harbaugh, Brent K.
    Hu, Jinguo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2007, 132 (02) : 219 - 229
  • [14] Analysis of the relationships between species of the genus Prosopis revealed by the use of molecular markers
    Ramírez, L
    de la Vega, A
    Razkin, N
    Luna, V
    Harris, PJC
    AGRONOMIE, 1999, 19 (01): : 31 - 43
  • [15] Genetic relationships between diploid and allotetraploid cherry species (Prunus avium, Prunus × gondouinii and Prunus cerasus)
    M Tavaud
    A Zanetto
    J L David
    F Laigret
    E Dirlewanger
    Heredity, 2004, 93 : 631 - 638
  • [16] Assessment of genetic relationships between Rhus L. species using RAPD markers
    Prakash, Surya
    Van Staden, Johannes
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2007, 54 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [17] Assessment of genetic relationships between Rhus L. species using RAPD markers
    Surya Prakash
    Johannes Van Staden
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2007, 54 : 7 - 11
  • [18] Genomic relationships among diploid and polyploid species of the genus Ludwigia L. section Jussiaea using a combination of molecular cytogenetic , morphological, and crossing investigations
    Barloy, Dominique
    Portillo-Lemus, Luis
    Krueger-Hadfield, Stacy
    Huteau, Virginie
    Coriton, Oliver
    PEER COMMUNITY JOURNAL, 2024, 4
  • [19] GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SEVERAL ROMANIAN PLUM VARIETIES USING RAPD MOLECULAR MARKERS
    Iordachescu, Mihaela
    Badulescu, Liliana
    Asanica, Adrian
    Udriste, Anca Amalia
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES B-HORTICULTURE, 2022, 66 (02): : 82 - 86
  • [20] Genetic relationships between diploid and allotetraploid cherry species (Prunus avium, Prunus x gondouinii and Prunus cerasus)
    Tavaud, M
    Zanetto, A
    David, JL
    Laigret, F
    Dirlewanger, E
    HEREDITY, 2004, 93 (06) : 631 - 638