The efficiency of cutting balloon angioplasty in the treatment of in-stent restenosis

被引:0
|
作者
Ates, Haci [1 ]
Duygu, Hamza [1 ]
Cakir, Cayan [1 ]
Acet, Halit [1 ]
Akdemir, Sefa [1 ]
Akyildiz, Zehra Ilke [1 ]
Kocabas, Ugur [1 ]
Nazli, Cem [1 ]
Ergene, Oktay [1 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Kardiyol Klin, Izmir, Turkey
来源
ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2011年 / 11卷 / 05期
关键词
Restenosis; cutting balloon angioplasty;
D O I
10.5152/akd.2011.111
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Although stents reduce the restenosis rate, stent restenosis continues to be a major problem and the optimal treatment of stent restenosis is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the angiographic recurrent stent restenosis rate at 6-12 months after successful cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) for the bare metal stent restenosis. Methods: Thirty patients (mean age: 57.9 +/- 11.6, 22 males) undergoing successful CBA for the treatment of in-stent restenosis at our hospital were prospectively included in this study. Control coronary angiography was performed at 6-12 months after CBA. Lesion length, minimal lumen diameter (MLD), and reference vessel diameter were analyzed by computerized digital angiographic analysis. Recurrent restenosis was defined as the lesions obstructing the lumen more than 50%. We described the lesions shorter than 10 mm as to be focal and those longer than 10 mm as to be diffuse. We used Student t, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U tests for statistical analysis. Results: Two patients had two distinct lesions; therefore, 32 lesions were assessed. There were 9 (28.1%) recurrent restenosis on the control coronary angiography. Recurrent restenosis developed in 3/21 (14.3%) of focal type lesions and 6/11(54.5%) of diffuse type lesions (p=0.035). Pre-procedural MLD was lower in the restenotic group compared to non-restenotic group (0.41 +/- 0.29 vs. 0.64 +/- 0.17 mm, p=0.048) while percent of stenosis was higher in the restenotic group (76.8 +/- 12 vs. 69.6 +/- 5.37%, p=0.029). Conclusion: In the selected patients, CBA is an effective and a safe method for the treatment of bare metal stent restenosis. CBA might be considered as a first-line treatment method in patients with focal type lesions. (Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2011; 11: 436-40)
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 440
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanism of cutting balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis: An intravascular ultrasound study
    Montorsi, P
    Galli, S
    Fabbiocchi, F
    Loaldi, A
    Grancini, L
    Ravagnani, P
    Trabattoni, D
    Cozzi, S
    Grasselli, D
    Bartorelli, AL
    CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (17) : 616 - +
  • [22] Preliminary experience with cutting balloon angioplasty for iliac artery in-stent restenosis
    Tsetis, Dimitrios
    Belli, Anna Maria
    Morgan, Robert
    Basile, Antonio
    Kostas, Theodoros
    Manousaki, Eirini
    Katsamouris, Asterios
    Gourtsoyiannis, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2008, 15 (02) : 193 - 202
  • [23] Mechanism of cutting balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis: An intravascular ultrasound study
    Montorsi, P
    Galli, S
    Fabbiocchi, F
    Loaldi, A
    Trabattoni, D
    Grancini, L
    Cozzi, S
    Ravagnani, P
    Parodi, O
    Bartorelli, AL
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2002, 56 (02) : 166 - 173
  • [24] Conventional balloon angioplasty versus peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty for treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis: Initial experience
    Dick, Petra
    Sabeti, Schila
    Mlekusch, Wolfgang
    Schlager, Oliver
    Amighi, Jasmin
    Haumer, Markus
    Cejna, Manfred
    Minar, Erich
    Schillinger, Martin
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (01) : 297 - 302
  • [25] Cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis in diabetics: A matched comparison of 6 months' outcome with conventional balloon angioplasty
    Cin, Veli Gokhan
    Pekdemir, Hasan
    Akkus, Mehmet Necdet
    Camsari, Ahmet
    Doven, Oben
    Yenihan, Senay
    ANGIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (04) : 445 - 452
  • [26] Cutting balloon angioplasty vs. conventional balloon angioplasty in patients receiving intracoronary brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis
    Fasseas, P
    Orford, JL
    Lennon, R
    O'Neill, J
    Denktas, AE
    Panetta, CJ
    Berger, PB
    Holmes, DR
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (02) : 152 - 157
  • [27] Comparison of the efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty and balloon angioplasty for high-risk in-stent restenosis.
    Iijima, R
    Nakamura, M
    Kitagawa, Y
    Nakajima, R
    Yoshitama, T
    Takagi, T
    Anzai, H
    Tsunoda, T
    Yamaguchi, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 86 (8A): : 121I - 121I
  • [28] BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY FOR TREATMENT OF IN-STENT RESTENOSIS - FEASIBILITY, SAFETY, AND EFFICACY
    MACANDER, PJ
    ROUBIN, GS
    AGRAWAL, SK
    CANNON, AD
    DEAN, LS
    BAXLEY, WA
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1994, 32 (02): : 125 - 131
  • [29] Mechanisms of cutting-balloon angioplasty in the treatment of in-stent restenosis:: A volumetric intravascular ultrasound study
    Schiele, TM
    König, A
    Rieber, J
    Baylacher, M
    Stempfle, HU
    Theisen, K
    Klauss, V
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (02) : 82A - 83A
  • [30] Balloon angioplasty versus debulking for treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis
    Dauerman, HL
    Baim, DS
    Sparano, AM
    Gibson, CM
    Kuntz, RE
    Carrozza, JP
    Cohen, DJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (02) : 455A - 455A