Abdominal MR Imaging at 3.0 T

被引:69
|
作者
Akisik, Fatih M. [1 ]
Sandrasegaran, Kumaresan [1 ]
Aisen, Alex M. [1 ]
Lin, Chen [1 ]
Lall, Chandana [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/rg.275075023
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance ( MR) imaging at 3.0 T offers an improved signal-to-noise ratio compared with that at 1.5 T. However, the physics of high field strength also brings disadvantages, such as increases in the specific absorption rate, in magnetic field inhomogeneity effects, and in susceptibility artifacts. The use of 3.0-T MR imaging for abdominal evaluations, in particular, has lagged behind that for other applications because of the difficulty of imaging a large volume while compensating for respiratory motion. At a minimum, abdominal MR imaging at 3.0 T requires modifications in the pulse sequences used at 1.5 T. Such modifications may include a decrease in the flip angle used for refocusing pulses and an increase in the repetition time for T1-weighted acquisitions. In addition, parallel imaging and other techniques ( hyperecho sequences, transition between pseudo steady states) may be used to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while decreasing acquisition time and minimizing the occurrence of artifacts on abdominal MR images. (c) RSNA, 2007
引用
收藏
页码:1433 / 1444
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Body MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Understanding the opportunities and challenges - Invited commentary
    Sher, Scott I.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 (05)
  • [32] Value of 3.0 T MR imaging in refractory partial epilepsy and negative 1.5 T MRI
    Nguyen, Dang Khoa
    Rochette, Emilie
    Leroux, Jean-Maxime
    Beaudoin, Gilles
    Cossette, Patrick
    Lassonde, Maryse
    Guilbert, Francois
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2010, 19 (08): : 475 - 478
  • [33] MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences
    Kornaat, PR
    Reeder, SB
    Koo, S
    Brittain, J
    Andriacchi, TP
    Gold, GE
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2004, 12 : S59 - S59
  • [34] 3.0 T proton MR spectroscopy
    Scarabino, T
    Nemore, E
    Giannatempo, GM
    Bertolino, A
    Tosetti, M
    Di Costanzo, A
    Polonara, G
    Salvolini, U
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 2004, 17 (06): : 784 - 794
  • [35] Development of a 0.014-in., anti-solenoid loop MR imaging guidewire for intravascular 3.0-T MR imaging
    Gu, Huidong
    Zhang, Feng
    Meng, Yanfeng
    Qiu, Bensheng
    Yang, Xiaoming
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 29 (07) : 1002 - 1006
  • [36] Evaluation of the acetabular labrum at 3.0-T MR imaging compared with 1.5-t MR arthrography: Preliminary experience
    Sundberg, TP
    Toomayan, GA
    Major, NM
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (02) : 706 - 711
  • [37] MR imaging in abdominal emergencies
    Pedrosa, I
    Rofsky, NM
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 41 (06) : 1243 - +
  • [38] Advances in abdominal MR imaging
    Ferrucci, JT
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 1998, 18 (06) : 1569 - 1586
  • [39] Magnetisation transfer MR imaging of the kidney: evaluation at 3.0 T in association with renal function
    Ito, Katsuyoshi
    Hayashida, Minoru
    Izumitani, Shogo
    Fujimine, Tomoko
    Onishi, Takeo
    Genba, Katsuhiro
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (08) : 2315 - 2319
  • [40] Optimization of MR diffusion-weighted imaging acquisitions for pancreatic cancer at 3.0 T
    Yao, Xiuzhong
    Kuang, Tiantao
    Wu, Li
    Feng, Hao
    Liu, Hao
    Cheng, Weizhong
    Rao, Shengxiang
    Wang, He
    Zeng, Mengsu
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (07) : 875 - 879