Abdominal MR Imaging at 3.0 T

被引:69
|
作者
Akisik, Fatih M. [1 ]
Sandrasegaran, Kumaresan [1 ]
Aisen, Alex M. [1 ]
Lin, Chen [1 ]
Lall, Chandana [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/rg.275075023
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance ( MR) imaging at 3.0 T offers an improved signal-to-noise ratio compared with that at 1.5 T. However, the physics of high field strength also brings disadvantages, such as increases in the specific absorption rate, in magnetic field inhomogeneity effects, and in susceptibility artifacts. The use of 3.0-T MR imaging for abdominal evaluations, in particular, has lagged behind that for other applications because of the difficulty of imaging a large volume while compensating for respiratory motion. At a minimum, abdominal MR imaging at 3.0 T requires modifications in the pulse sequences used at 1.5 T. Such modifications may include a decrease in the flip angle used for refocusing pulses and an increase in the repetition time for T1-weighted acquisitions. In addition, parallel imaging and other techniques ( hyperecho sequences, transition between pseudo steady states) may be used to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while decreasing acquisition time and minimizing the occurrence of artifacts on abdominal MR images. (c) RSNA, 2007
引用
收藏
页码:1433 / 1444
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3.0 T MR angiography
    Scarabino, T
    Nemore, E
    Giannatempo, GM
    Popolizio, T
    Stranieri, A
    Carriero, A
    Salvolini, U
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 2004, 17 (06): : 777 - 783
  • [22] Intraindividual comparison of MR-renal perfusion imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Michaely, Henrik J.
    Kramer, Harald
    Oesingmann, Niels
    Lodemann, Klaus-Peter
    Miserock, Karl
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (06) : 406 - 411
  • [23] Uterine Cervical Carcinoma: Preoperative Staging with 3.0-T MR Imaging-Comparison with 1.5-T MR Imaging
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Kim, Tonsok
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Imaoka, Izumi
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Tomoda, Kaname
    Tsutsui, Tateki
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    Kimura, Tadashi
    Nakamura, Hironobu
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (01) : 96 - 104
  • [24] Abdominal imaging at 4 T MR system: a preliminary result
    Uematsu, H
    Dougherty, L
    Takahashi, M
    Ohno, Y
    Nakatsu, M
    Schnall, MD
    Hatabu, H
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 47 (02) : 161 - 163
  • [25] 3.0 T high-resolution MR imaging of carpal ligaments and TFCC
    Lenk, S
    Ludescher, B
    Martirosan, P
    Schick, F
    Claussen, CD
    Schlemmer, HP
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2004, 176 (05): : 664 - 667
  • [26] Diffusion-tensor MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Initial observations
    Hunsche, S
    Moseley, ME
    Stoeter, P
    Hedehus, M
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (02) : 550 - 556
  • [27] Legislation governing the authorization, installation and use of 3.0 T MR imaging systems
    Maiorana, A
    d'Alesio, V
    Scarabino, T
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 2004, 17 (06): : 745 - 747
  • [28] Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: evaluation with 3.0T MR imaging
    Kaneda, Sachi
    Fujii, Shinya
    Fukunaga, Takeru
    Kakite, Suguru
    Kaminou, Toshio
    Kigawa, Junzo
    Harada, Tasuku
    Ogawa, Toshihide
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2011, 36 (05): : 612 - 618
  • [29] Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: evaluation with 3.0T MR imaging
    Sachi Kaneda
    Shinya Fujii
    Takeru Fukunaga
    Suguru Kakite
    Toshio Kaminou
    Junzo Kigawa
    Tasuku Harada
    Toshihide Ogawa
    Abdominal Imaging, 2011, 36 : 612 - 618
  • [30] An intravascular loopless monopole antenna for vessel wall MR imaging at 3.0 T
    Yuan, Hongyang
    Lv, Xing
    Ma, Xiaohai
    Zhang, Rui
    Fu, Youyi
    Yang, Xuedong
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Zhang, Zhaoqi
    Zhang, Jue
    Fang, Jing
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 31 (01) : 150 - 155