Evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF-11

被引:50
|
作者
Finlay, C. C. [1 ]
Maus, S. [2 ,3 ]
Beggan, C. D. [4 ]
Hamoudi, M. [5 ]
Lowes, F. J. [6 ]
Olsen, N. [7 ]
Thebault, E. [8 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Earth & Planetary Magnetism Grp, Inst Geophys, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] NOAA, NGDC, Silver Spring, MD USA
[3] Univ Colorado, CIRES, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] British Geol Survey, Edinburgh EH9 3LA, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, D-14473 Telegrafenberg, Germany
[6] Newcastle Univ, Sch Chem, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[7] DTU Space, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Univ Paris Diderot, CNRSINSU, Inst Phys Globe Paris, Equipe Geomagnetisme,UMR 7154, Paris, France
来源
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE | 2010年 / 62卷 / 10期
关键词
Geomagnetism; field modelling; reference field; secular variation; SECULAR VARIATION MODEL; POWER SPECTRUM; GENERATION;
D O I
10.5047/eps.2010.11.005
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The eleventh generation of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) was agreed in December 2009 by a task force appointed by the International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (IAGA) Division V Working Group V-MOD. New spherical harmonic main field models for epochs 2005.0 (DGRF-2005) and 2010.0 (IGRF-2010), and predictive linear secular variation for the interval 2010.0-2015.0 (SV-2010-2015) were derived from weighted averages of candidate models submitted by teams led by DTU Space, Denmark (team A); NOAA/NGDC, U.S.A. (team B); BGS, U. K. (team C); IZMIRAN, Russia (team D); EOST, France (team E); IPGP, France (team F); GFZ, Germany (team G) and NASA-GSFC, U. S. A. (team H). Here, we report the evaluations of candidate models carried out by the IGRF-11 task force during October/November 2009 and describe the weightings used to derive the new IGRF-11 model. The evaluations include calculations of root mean square vector field differences between the candidates, comparisons of the power spectra, and degree correlations between the candidates and a mean model. Coefficient by coefficient analysis including determination of weighting factors used in a robust estimation of mean coefficients is also reported. Maps of differences in the vertical field intensity at Earth's surface between the candidates and weighted mean models are presented. Candidates with anomalous aspects are identified and efforts made to pinpoint both troublesome coefficients and geographical regions where large variations between candidates originate. A retrospective analysis of IGRF-10 main field candidates for epoch 2005.0 and predictive secular variation candidates for 2005.0-2010.0 using the new IGRF-11 models as a reference is also reported. The high quality and consistency of main field models derived using vector satellite data is demonstrated; based on internal consistency DGRF-2005 has a formal root mean square vector field error over Earth's surface of 1.0 nT. Difficulties nevertheless remain in accurately forecasting field evolution only five years into the future.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 804
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The BGS magnetic field candidate models for the 10th generation IGRF
    Lesur, V
    Macmillan, S
    Thomson, A
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2005, 57 (12): : 1157 - 1163
  • [42] An IGRF candidate main geomagnetic field model for epoch 2000 and a secular variation model for 2000–2005
    Benoit Langlais
    Mioara Mandea
    Earth, Planets and Space, 2000, 52 : 1137 - 1148
  • [43] AN EVALUATION FOR THE NEW-ZEALAND REGION AND ANTARCTICA OF CANDIDATE MODELS FOR THE IGRF SERIES
    MCKNIGHT, JD
    JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1992, 44 (09): : 863 - 870
  • [44] The CHAOS-3 geomagnetic field model and candidates for the 11th generation IGRF
    Olsen, Nils
    Mandea, Mioara
    Sabaka, Terence J.
    Toffner-Clausen, Lars
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2010, 62 (10): : 719 - 727
  • [45] An evaluation over the New Zealand region of candidate and adopted models for IGRF 1995
    McKnight, JD
    JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1997, 49 (2-3): : 353 - 358
  • [46] Geomagnetic core field models and secular variation forecasts for the 13th International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF-13)
    I. Wardinski
    D. Saturnino
    H. Amit
    A. Chambodut
    B. Langlais
    M. Mandea
    E. Thébault
    Earth, Planets and Space, 72
  • [47] The CHAOS-3 geomagnetic field model and candidates for the 11th generation IGRF
    Nils Olsen
    Mioara Mandea
    Terence J. Sabaka
    Lars Tøffner-Clausen
    Earth, Planets and Space, 62
  • [48] Evaluation of candidate models for the 13th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field
    Alken, P.
    Thebault, E.
    Beggan, C. D.
    Aubert, J.
    Baerenzung, J.
    Brown, W. J.
    Califf, S.
    Chulliat, A.
    Cox, G. A.
    Finlay, C. C.
    Fournier, A.
    Gillet, N.
    Hammer, M. D.
    Holschneider, M.
    Hulot, G.
    Korte, M.
    Lesur, V.
    Livermore, P. W.
    Lowes, F. J.
    Macmillan, S.
    Nair, M.
    Olsen, N.
    Ropp, G.
    Rother, M.
    Schnepf, N. R.
    Stolle, C.
    Toh, H.
    Vervelidou, F.
    Vigneron, P.
    Wardinski, I.
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2021, 73 (01):
  • [49] Geomagnetic core field models and secular variation forecasts for the 13th International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF-13)
    Wardinski, I.
    Saturnino, D.
    Amit, H.
    Chambodut, A.
    Langlais, B.
    Mandea, M.
    Thebault, E.
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2020, 72 (01):
  • [50] Evaluation of candidate models for the 13th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field
    P. Alken
    E. Thébault
    C. D. Beggan
    J. Aubert
    J. Baerenzung
    W. J. Brown
    S. Califf
    A. Chulliat
    G. A. Cox
    C. C. Finlay
    A. Fournier
    N. Gillet
    M. D. Hammer
    M. Holschneider
    G. Hulot
    M. Korte
    V. Lesur
    P. W. Livermore
    F. J. Lowes
    S. Macmillan
    M. Nair
    N. Olsen
    G. Ropp
    M. Rother
    N. R. Schnepf
    C. Stolle
    H. Toh
    F. Vervelidou
    P. Vigneron
    I. Wardinski
    Earth, Planets and Space, 73