Evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF-11

被引:50
|
作者
Finlay, C. C. [1 ]
Maus, S. [2 ,3 ]
Beggan, C. D. [4 ]
Hamoudi, M. [5 ]
Lowes, F. J. [6 ]
Olsen, N. [7 ]
Thebault, E. [8 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Earth & Planetary Magnetism Grp, Inst Geophys, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] NOAA, NGDC, Silver Spring, MD USA
[3] Univ Colorado, CIRES, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] British Geol Survey, Edinburgh EH9 3LA, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, D-14473 Telegrafenberg, Germany
[6] Newcastle Univ, Sch Chem, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[7] DTU Space, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Univ Paris Diderot, CNRSINSU, Inst Phys Globe Paris, Equipe Geomagnetisme,UMR 7154, Paris, France
来源
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE | 2010年 / 62卷 / 10期
关键词
Geomagnetism; field modelling; reference field; secular variation; SECULAR VARIATION MODEL; POWER SPECTRUM; GENERATION;
D O I
10.5047/eps.2010.11.005
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The eleventh generation of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) was agreed in December 2009 by a task force appointed by the International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (IAGA) Division V Working Group V-MOD. New spherical harmonic main field models for epochs 2005.0 (DGRF-2005) and 2010.0 (IGRF-2010), and predictive linear secular variation for the interval 2010.0-2015.0 (SV-2010-2015) were derived from weighted averages of candidate models submitted by teams led by DTU Space, Denmark (team A); NOAA/NGDC, U.S.A. (team B); BGS, U. K. (team C); IZMIRAN, Russia (team D); EOST, France (team E); IPGP, France (team F); GFZ, Germany (team G) and NASA-GSFC, U. S. A. (team H). Here, we report the evaluations of candidate models carried out by the IGRF-11 task force during October/November 2009 and describe the weightings used to derive the new IGRF-11 model. The evaluations include calculations of root mean square vector field differences between the candidates, comparisons of the power spectra, and degree correlations between the candidates and a mean model. Coefficient by coefficient analysis including determination of weighting factors used in a robust estimation of mean coefficients is also reported. Maps of differences in the vertical field intensity at Earth's surface between the candidates and weighted mean models are presented. Candidates with anomalous aspects are identified and efforts made to pinpoint both troublesome coefficients and geographical regions where large variations between candidates originate. A retrospective analysis of IGRF-10 main field candidates for epoch 2005.0 and predictive secular variation candidates for 2005.0-2010.0 using the new IGRF-11 models as a reference is also reported. The high quality and consistency of main field models derived using vector satellite data is demonstrated; based on internal consistency DGRF-2005 has a formal root mean square vector field error over Earth's surface of 1.0 nT. Difficulties nevertheless remain in accurately forecasting field evolution only five years into the future.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 804
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The 2000 revision of the joint UK/US geomagnetic field models and an IGRF 2000 candidate model
    S. Macmillan
    J. M. Quinn
    Earth, Planets and Space, 2000, 52 : 1149 - 1162
  • [22] Two geomagnetic regional models for Albania and south-east Italy from 1990 to 2010 with prediction to 2012 and comparison with IGRF-11
    Qamili, Enkelejda
    De Santis, Angelo
    Cianchini, Gianfranco
    Duka, Bejo
    Gaya-Pique, Luis R.
    Dominici, Guido
    Hyka, Niko
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2010, 62 (10): : 833 - 841
  • [23] Stochastic forecasting of the geomagnetic field from the COV-OBS.x1 geomagnetic field model, and candidate models for IGRF-12
    Gillet, Nicolas
    Barrois, Olivier
    Finlay, Christopher C.
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2015, 67 : 1 - 14
  • [24] Stochastic forecasting of the geomagnetic field from the COV-OBS.x1 geomagnetic field model, and candidate models for IGRF-12
    Nicolas Gillet
    Olivier Barrois
    Christopher C Finlay
    Earth, Planets and Space, 67
  • [25] COMPARISONS OF GEOMAGNETIC DATA MEASURED IN ROMANIA WITH THE DATA OF INTERNATIONAL GEOMAGNETIC REFERENCE FIELD 11 (IGRF 11)
    Asimopolos, Laurentiu
    Niculici, Eugen
    Pestina, Agata-Monica
    Asimopolos, Natalia-Silvia
    11TH INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC GEOCONFERENCE (SGEM 2011), VOL II, 2011, : 25 - 32
  • [26] EVALUATION OF IGRF CANDIDATE MODELS OVER THE AUSTRALIAN REGION
    WINCH, DE
    MCEWIN, AJ
    BARTON, CE
    PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1987, 48 (3-4) : 338 - 343
  • [27] COMPARISON OF CANDIDATE IGRF MODELS
    LANGEL, RA
    ESTES, RH
    JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1982, 34 (06): : 365 - 381
  • [28] GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD VERSUS IGRF
    CAIN, JC
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1972, 53 (04): : 353 - +
  • [29] THE GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD - 1970-1990 AND THE NASA CANDIDATE MODELS FOR DGRF1985 AND IGRF1990
    LANGEL, RA
    SABAKA, TJ
    BALDWIN, RT
    JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1992, 44 (09): : 745 - 767
  • [30] EVALUATION OVER AUSTRALIA OF CANDIDATE MODELS FOR IGRF90
    BARTON, CE
    WINCH, DE
    MCEWIN, AJ
    HITCHMAN, AP
    HOPGOOD, PA
    JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1992, 44 (09): : 843 - 854