Contrast-enhanced Dedicated Breast CT: Initial Clinical Experience

被引:157
|
作者
Prionas, Nicolas D. [1 ]
Lindfors, Karen K. [1 ]
Ray, Shonket [1 ]
Huang, Shih-Ying [1 ]
Beckett, Laurel A. [2 ]
Monsky, Wayne L. [1 ]
Boone, John M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biostat, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS; DIAGNOSIS; FEATURES; MDCT; MRI;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.10092311
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To quantify contrast material enhancement of breast lesions scanned with dedicated breast computed tomography (CT) and to compare their conspicuity with that at unenhanced breast CT and mammography. Materials and Methods: Approval of the institutional review board and the Radiation Use Committee and written informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Between September 2006 and April 2009, 46 women (mean age, 53.2 years; age range, 35-72 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 lesions underwent unenhanced breast CT and contrast material-enhanced breast CT before biopsy. Two radiologists independently scored lesion conspicuity for contrast-enhanced breast CT versus mammography and for contrast-enhanced breast CT versus unenhanced breast CT. Mean lesion voxel intensity was measured in Hounsfield units and normalized to adipose tissue intensity on manually segmented images obtained before and after administration of contrast material. Regression models focused on conspicuity and quantified enhancement were used to estimate the effect of pathologic diagnosis (benign vs malignant), lesion type (mass vs calcifications), breast density, and interradiologist variability. Results: Fifty-four lesions (25 benign, 29 malignant) in 46 subjects were analyzed. Malignant lesions were seen significantly better at contrast-enhanced breast CT than at unenhanced breast CT (P < .001) or mammography (P < .001). Malignant calcifi cations (malignant lesions manifested mammographically as microcalcifications only, n = 7) were seen better at contrast-enhanced breast CT than at unenhanced breast CT (P < .001) and were seen similarly at contrast-enhanced breast CT and mammography. Malignant lesions enhanced 55.9 HU +/- 4.0 (standard error), whereas benign lesions enhanced 17.6 HU +/- 6.1 (P,.001). Ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 5) enhanced a mean of 59.6 HU +/- 2.8. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of lesion enhancement yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.876. Conclusion: Conspicuity of malignant breast lesions, including ductal carcinoma in situ, is significantly improved at contrast-enhanced breast CT. Quantifying lesion enhancement may aid in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 723
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stereotactic biopsy with contrast-enhanced mammography: the initial Australian experience
    Layden, Natalie
    Sesnan, Genevieve
    Kessell, Meredith
    Hardie, Mireille
    Taylor, Donna
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 68 (04) : 393 - 400
  • [32] Evaluation of bowel ischemia with contrast-enhanced US: Initial experience
    Hata, J
    Kamada, T
    Haruma, K
    Kusunoki, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (02) : 712 - 715
  • [33] In-line spectroscopy for the quantification of iodine in a breast perfusion phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT imaging validation
    Goris, Liselot
    Mikerov, Mikhail
    Manohar, Srirang
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2024: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PT 1, 2024, 12925
  • [34] DOES INITIAL CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH COLON DIVERTICULAR BLEEDING?
    Kurosaki, Shigeyuki
    Toda, Nobuo
    Arai, Junya
    Kurokawa, Ken
    Shibata, Chikako
    Funato, Kazuyoshi
    Kondou, Mayuko
    Takagi, Kaoru
    Kojima, Kentaro
    Ooki, Takamasa
    Seki, Michiharu
    Tagawa, Kazumi
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB98 - AB99
  • [35] DOES INITIAL CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH COLON DIVERTICULAR BLEEDING?
    Takekuma, Yuto
    Kurosaki, Sigeyuki
    Tanno, Erika
    Suzuki, Tasuku
    Nakahara, Takenori
    Abe, Toshiaki
    Kitamura, Yuri
    Sato, Koki
    Kondo, Mayuko
    Kojima, Kentaro
    Seki, Michiharu
    Toda, Nobuo
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB479 - AB479
  • [36] Fluoroscopic triggering of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography: Initial clinical experience
    Riederer, SJ
    Wilman, AH
    King, BF
    Debbins, JP
    Breen, JF
    Ehman, RL
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 675 - 675
  • [37] Contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound. The clinical context
    A. Robin M. Wilson
    European Radiology, 2001, 11 : E35 - E40
  • [38] Contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound. The clinical context
    Wilson, ARM
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (Suppl 3) : E35 - E40
  • [39] Experience of contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with breast augmentation surgery
    Carnahan, Molly
    Pockaj, Barbara
    Pizzitola, Victor
    Giurescu, Marina
    Lorans, Roxanne
    Eversman, William
    Sharpe, Richard
    Cronin, Patricia
    Northfelt, Donald
    Anderson, Karen
    Ernst, Brenda
    Patel, Bhavika
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (04)
  • [40] Contrast-enhanced mammography in the evaluation of breast calcifications: preliminary experience
    Depretto, Catherine
    Borelli, Anna
    Liguori, Alessandro
    Presti, Gabriele
    Vingiani, Andrea
    Cartia, Francesco
    Ferranti, Claudio
    Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P.
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2020, 106 (06): : 491 - 496