Contrast-enhanced Dedicated Breast CT: Initial Clinical Experience

被引:157
|
作者
Prionas, Nicolas D. [1 ]
Lindfors, Karen K. [1 ]
Ray, Shonket [1 ]
Huang, Shih-Ying [1 ]
Beckett, Laurel A. [2 ]
Monsky, Wayne L. [1 ]
Boone, John M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biostat, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS; DIAGNOSIS; FEATURES; MDCT; MRI;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.10092311
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To quantify contrast material enhancement of breast lesions scanned with dedicated breast computed tomography (CT) and to compare their conspicuity with that at unenhanced breast CT and mammography. Materials and Methods: Approval of the institutional review board and the Radiation Use Committee and written informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Between September 2006 and April 2009, 46 women (mean age, 53.2 years; age range, 35-72 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 lesions underwent unenhanced breast CT and contrast material-enhanced breast CT before biopsy. Two radiologists independently scored lesion conspicuity for contrast-enhanced breast CT versus mammography and for contrast-enhanced breast CT versus unenhanced breast CT. Mean lesion voxel intensity was measured in Hounsfield units and normalized to adipose tissue intensity on manually segmented images obtained before and after administration of contrast material. Regression models focused on conspicuity and quantified enhancement were used to estimate the effect of pathologic diagnosis (benign vs malignant), lesion type (mass vs calcifications), breast density, and interradiologist variability. Results: Fifty-four lesions (25 benign, 29 malignant) in 46 subjects were analyzed. Malignant lesions were seen significantly better at contrast-enhanced breast CT than at unenhanced breast CT (P < .001) or mammography (P < .001). Malignant calcifi cations (malignant lesions manifested mammographically as microcalcifications only, n = 7) were seen better at contrast-enhanced breast CT than at unenhanced breast CT (P < .001) and were seen similarly at contrast-enhanced breast CT and mammography. Malignant lesions enhanced 55.9 HU +/- 4.0 (standard error), whereas benign lesions enhanced 17.6 HU +/- 6.1 (P,.001). Ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 5) enhanced a mean of 59.6 HU +/- 2.8. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of lesion enhancement yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.876. Conclusion: Conspicuity of malignant breast lesions, including ductal carcinoma in situ, is significantly improved at contrast-enhanced breast CT. Quantifying lesion enhancement may aid in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 723
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparing Concordance Between Contrast-Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT and Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast
    Seifert, P.
    Destounis, S.
    Somerville, P.
    Murphy, P.
    Logan-Young, W.
    Arieno, A.
    Morgan, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (05)
  • [22] Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Successful Clinical Experience
    Woodroof, Andrea
    APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (11)
  • [23] Combining low tube voltage and iterative reconstruction for contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the chest-Initial clinical experience
    Li, Q.
    Yu, H.
    Zhang, L.
    Fan, L.
    Liu, S. -y.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (05) : E249 - E253
  • [24] Technical note: Characterization, validation, and spectral optimization of a dedicated breast CT system for contrast-enhanced imaging
    Pautasso, Juan J.
    Michielsen, Koen
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (05) : 3322 - 3333
  • [25] FURTHER EXPERIENCE WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT IN HEAD TRAUMA
    TSAI, FY
    HUPRICH, JE
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 1978, 16 : 314 - 317
  • [26] Initial clinical experience with a dedicated breast PET system
    Swanson, Tiffinee
    Hunt, Katie
    Hruska, Carrie
    Fazzio, Robert
    Thuy Tran
    Solberg, Courtney
    Long, Zaiyang
    OConnor, Michael
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57
  • [27] Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis-Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    Lewin, John M.
    Chiang, Chia-Ling
    Hung, Bao-Hui
    Yang, Tsung-Lung
    Huang, Jer-Shyung
    Liao, Jia-Bin
    Pan, Huay-Ben
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (12) : 2501 - 2508
  • [28] Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: Initial experience
    Kuhl, CK
    Jost, P
    Morakkabati, N
    Zivanovic, O
    Schild, HH
    Gieseke, J
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (03) : 666 - 676
  • [29] Inflammatory breast cancer: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in patients receiving bevacizumab - Initial experience
    Thukral, Arpi
    Thomasson, David M.
    Chow, Catherine K.
    Eulate, Reyes
    Wedarn, Suparna B.
    Gupta, Sandeep N.
    Wise, Betty J.
    Steinberg, Seth M.
    Liewehr, David J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Swain, Sandra M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (03) : 727 - 735
  • [30] Evaluation of Renal Masses With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Initial Experience
    Gerst, Scott
    Hann, Lucy E.
    Li, Duan
    Gonen, Mithat
    Tickoo, Satish
    Sohn, Michael J.
    Russo, Paul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (04) : 897 - 906