Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model

被引:54
|
作者
Hein, Simon [1 ]
Petzold, Ralf [1 ]
Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo [1 ]
Mueller, Philippe-Fabian [1 ]
Schoenthaler, Martin [1 ]
Miernik, Arkadiusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Med Ctr, Div Urotechnol,Dept Urol, Hugstetter Str 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Nephrolithiasis; Urolithiasis; Ho; YAG laser lithotripsy; Ureteroscopy; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Thermal effect; UPPER URINARY-TRACT; HEAT-GENERATION; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-019-02808-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the thermal effect of high-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy in flexible/semirigid ureteroscopy (fURS/sURS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in a standardized ex vivo porcine kidney model with real-time temperature assessment. Methods The experimental setup consisted of three models designed to evaluate the thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in fURS, sURS and PNL, respectively. In all setups, a postmortem porcine kidney was placed in a 37 degrees C water bath. Three thermocouples were inserted into the renal parenchyma while a flexible thermocouple was placed 3-4 mm proximal to the laser fiber to measure temperature variations in the collecting system. The thermal impact was evaluated in relation to laser power between 5 and 100 W and various irrigation rates (37 degrees C, 0-100 ml/min). Results In all three experimental setups, sufficient irrigation was required to prevent potentially damaging temperatures into the renal pelvis and parenchyma. Even 5 W in fURS can lead to a potentially harming temperature rise if insufficient irrigation is applied. Particularly, high-power settings >= 30 W carry an elevated risk for critical temperature rises. The results allow the definition of a specific irrigation threshold for any power setting to prevent critical temperatures in the present study design. Conclusions Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy bears the risk of thermal damages to the urinary tract even at low-power settings if inadequate irrigation is applied. Sufficient irrigation is mandatory to perform safe Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. Based on the results, we developed a formula calculating the approximate Delta T for irrigation rates >= 30 ml/min: Delta T = 15 K x (power [W]/irrigation [ml/min]).
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 760
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of intrapelvic pressures during flexible ureteroscopy, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in a kidney model
    Steeve Doizi
    Audrey Uzan
    Etienne Xavier Keller
    Vincent De Coninck
    Hatem Kamkoum
    Yazeed Barghouthy
    Eugenio Ventimiglia
    Olivier Traxer
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 2709 - 2717
  • [42] Percutaneous-Based Management of Staghorn Calculi in Solitary Kidney: Combined Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
    Zhong, Wen
    Zhao, Zhijian
    Wang, Liang
    Swami, Sunil
    Zeng, Guohua
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 94 (01) : 70 - 73
  • [43] Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of 2-3 cm Multicalyceal Kidney Stones
    Cakici, Mehmet Caglar
    Sari, Sercan
    Ozok, Hakki Ligur
    Karakoyunlu, Nihat
    Hepsen, Emre
    Sagnak, Levent
    Topaloglu, Hikmet
    Ersoy, Hamit
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2018, 5 (04): : 143 - 148
  • [44] Re: Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Shockwave Lithotripsy, and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
    Assimos, Dean G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (01): : 157 - 157
  • [45] Re: Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones: A Meta-Analysis
    Assimos, Dean G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (06): : 1819 - 1819
  • [46] Which Should be Preferred for Moderate-Size Kidney Stones? Ultramini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery?
    Demirbas, Arif
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Sunay, Mehmet Melih
    Karakan, Tolga
    Karagoz, Mehmet Ali
    Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 (12) : 1285 - 1289
  • [47] Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in larger kidney stones. Could SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser change the game?
    Taratkin, Mark
    Azilgareeva, Camilla
    Chinenov, Denis
    Mikhailov, Vasiliy
    Inoyatov, Jasur
    Ali, Stanislav
    Korolev, Dmitry
    Tsarichenko, Dmitry
    Corrales, Mariela
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 74 (02) : 229 - 234
  • [48] Thermal Safety Boundaries for Laser Power and Irrigation Rate During Ureteroscopy: In Vivo Porcine Assessment With a Ho:YAG Laser
    Marom, Ron
    Dau, Julie J.
    Hall, Timothy L.
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Louters, Marne M.
    Kim, Hyung Joon
    Khajeh, Nikta Rezakahn
    Roberts, William W.
    UROLOGY, 2023, 180 : 81 - 85
  • [49] Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Shock Wave Lithotripsy, and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lower Pole Renal Calculi 10-20 mm
    Ozturk, Ufuk
    Sener, Nevzat Can
    Goktug, H. N. Goksel
    Nalbant, Ismail
    Gucuk, Adnan
    Imamoglu, M. Abdurrahim
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 91 (03) : 345 - 349
  • [50] Retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of stones in horseshoe kidney; what are the advantages and disadvantages compared to each other?
    Kartal, Ibrahim
    Cakici, Mehmet Caglar
    Selmi, Volkan
    Sari, Sercan
    Ozdemir, Harun
    Ersoy, Hamit
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 72 (02) : 156 - 162