Shaking Table Test of a Half-Scale Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutment

被引:34
|
作者
Zheng, Yewei [1 ]
Sander, Andrew C. [1 ]
Rong, Wenyong [1 ]
Fox, Patrick J. [2 ]
Shing, P. Benson [1 ]
McCartney, John S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Struct Engn, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 212 E Coll Ave, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL | 2018年 / 41卷 / 01期
关键词
shaking table test; reduced-scale model; geogrid; geosynthetic-reinforced soil; bridge abutment; RETAINING WALL MODELS; DIRECT SHEAR MACHINE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; MODULAR-BLOCK; CLAY LINERS; DEFORMATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1520/GTJ20160268
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents an experimental study on the dynamic response of a half-scale geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutment system using a shaking table. Experimental design of the model specimen followed established similitude relationships for shaking table tests on reduced-scale models in a 1-g gravitational field, including scaling of model geometry, geosynthetic-reinforcement stiffness, backfill soil modulus, bridge load, and characteristics of the earthquake motions. The 2.7-m-high GRS bridge abutment was constructed using well-graded sand backfill, modular facing blocks, and uniaxial geogrid reinforcements with a vertical spacing of 0.15 m in both the longitudinal and transverse directions. A bridge beam was placed on the GRS bridge abutment at one end and on a concrete support wall resting on a sliding platform off the shaking table at the other end. The GRS bridge abutment system was subjected to a series of input motions in the longitudinal direction. Results indicate that the testing system performed well, and that the GRS bridge abutment experienced small deformations. For two earthquake motions, the maximum incremental residual facing displacement in model scale was 1.0 mm, and the average incremental residual bridge seat settlement in model scale was 1.4 mm, which corresponds to a vertical strain of 0.7 %.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 192
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GEOSYNTHETIC-REINFORCED SOIL WALL DESIGN
    CLAYBOURN, AF
    WU, JTH
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 1993, 12 (08) : 707 - 724
  • [42] Static and seismic numerical modeling of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental bridge abutments
    Fakharian, K.
    Attar, I. H.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 14 (04) : 228 - 243
  • [43] Acceleration Response of a Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutment under Dynamic Loading
    Zheng, Yewei
    McCartney, John S.
    Fox, Patrick J.
    Shing, P. Benson
    GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SOIL DYNAMICS V: SLOPE STABILITY AND LANDSLIDES, LABORATORY TESTING, AND IN SITU TESTING, 2018, (293): : 1 - 9
  • [44] 3D Deformation Behavior of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutments
    Rong, Wenyong
    Zheng, Yewei
    McCartney, John S.
    Fox, Patrick J.
    GEOTECHNICAL FRONTIERS 2017: WALLS AND SLOPES, 2017, (278): : 44 - 53
  • [45] A Study of the Effects of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil and Reinforcement Length on GRS Bridge Abutment
    Won, Myoung-Soo
    Langcuyan, Christine Patinga
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (23):
  • [46] Life cycle assessment of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge system - A case study
    Bizjak, Karmen Fifer
    Lenart, Stanislav
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2018, 46 (05) : 543 - 558
  • [47] Numerical Investigation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutments under Static Loading
    Zheng, Yewei
    Fox, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (05)
  • [48] Life cycle assessment of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge system – A case study
    Fifer Bizjak K.
    Lenart S.
    Fifer Bizjak, Karmen (Karmen.fifer@zag.si), 2018, Elsevier Ltd (46) : 543 - 558
  • [49] Discussion of 'A new type of integral bridge comprising geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls'
    Xu, M.
    Clayton, C. R. I.
    Bloodworth, A.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 17 (04) : 260 - 271
  • [50] Shaking and tilt table tests of geosynthetic-reinforced soil and conventional-type retaining walls (vol 5, pg 73, 1997)
    Koseki, J
    Munaf, Y
    Tatsuoka, F
    Tateyama, M
    Kojima, K
    Sato, T
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 6 (06) : 519 - 519