Shaking Table Test of a Half-Scale Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutment

被引:34
|
作者
Zheng, Yewei [1 ]
Sander, Andrew C. [1 ]
Rong, Wenyong [1 ]
Fox, Patrick J. [2 ]
Shing, P. Benson [1 ]
McCartney, John S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Struct Engn, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 212 E Coll Ave, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL | 2018年 / 41卷 / 01期
关键词
shaking table test; reduced-scale model; geogrid; geosynthetic-reinforced soil; bridge abutment; RETAINING WALL MODELS; DIRECT SHEAR MACHINE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; MODULAR-BLOCK; CLAY LINERS; DEFORMATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1520/GTJ20160268
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents an experimental study on the dynamic response of a half-scale geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutment system using a shaking table. Experimental design of the model specimen followed established similitude relationships for shaking table tests on reduced-scale models in a 1-g gravitational field, including scaling of model geometry, geosynthetic-reinforcement stiffness, backfill soil modulus, bridge load, and characteristics of the earthquake motions. The 2.7-m-high GRS bridge abutment was constructed using well-graded sand backfill, modular facing blocks, and uniaxial geogrid reinforcements with a vertical spacing of 0.15 m in both the longitudinal and transverse directions. A bridge beam was placed on the GRS bridge abutment at one end and on a concrete support wall resting on a sliding platform off the shaking table at the other end. The GRS bridge abutment system was subjected to a series of input motions in the longitudinal direction. Results indicate that the testing system performed well, and that the GRS bridge abutment experienced small deformations. For two earthquake motions, the maximum incremental residual facing displacement in model scale was 1.0 mm, and the average incremental residual bridge seat settlement in model scale was 1.4 mm, which corresponds to a vertical strain of 0.7 %.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 192
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamic stability of geosynthetic-reinforced soil integral bridge
    Munoz, H.
    Tatsuoka, F.
    Hirakawa, D.
    Nishikiori, H.
    Soma, R.
    Tateyama, M.
    Watanabe, K.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 19 (01) : 11 - 38
  • [22] Physical and Computational Modelling of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Model Slopes in Shaking Table Tests
    Srilatha, N.
    Latha, G. Madhavi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOSYNTHETICS AND GROUND ENGINEERING, 2022, 8 (06)
  • [23] Physical and Computational Modelling of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Model Slopes in Shaking Table Tests
    N. Srilatha
    G. Madhavi Latha
    International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2022, 8
  • [24] Seismic performance of a whole Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil - Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS) in shaking table test
    Xu, Chao
    Luo, Minmin
    Shen, Panpan
    Han, Jie
    Ren, Feifan
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2020, 48 (03) : 315 - 330
  • [25] Seismic Performance of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil-Integrated Structure in Shaking Table Test
    Luo M.
    Xu C.
    Yang Y.
    Yang Z.
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2019, 47 (11): : 1541 - 1547
  • [26] Numerical simulation of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls under seismic shaking
    Lee, K. Z. Z.
    Chang, N. Y.
    Ko, H. Y.
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2010, 28 (04) : 317 - 334
  • [27] Full-Scale Testing of Geosynthetic-Reinforced, Soil-Integrated Bridge System
    Saghebfar, Milad
    Abu-Farsakh, Murad Y.
    Ardah, Allam
    Chen, Qiming
    Fernandez, Benjamin A.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2017, (2656) : 40 - 52
  • [28] Experimental seismic analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures with three-dimensional reinforcements by shaking table tests
    Lo Grasso, A. S.
    Maugeri, M.
    Recalcati, P.
    GEOSYNTHETICS, VOLS 1-4, 2006, : 1489 - +
  • [29] Determining optimal designs for geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments
    Jelusic, Primoz
    Zlender, Bojan
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (05) : 3601 - 3614
  • [30] Determining optimal designs for geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments
    Primož Jelušič
    Bojan Žlender
    Soft Computing, 2020, 24 : 3601 - 3614