Spectroscopy-based multi-parametric quantification in subjects with liver iron overload at 1.5T and 3T

被引:8
|
作者
Simchick, Gregory [1 ]
Zhao, Ruiyang [1 ,2 ]
Hamilton, Gavin [3 ]
Reeder, Scott B. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Hernando, Diego [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biomed Engn, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Emergency Med, Madison, WI 53705 USA
关键词
chronic liver disease; iron overload; liver; liver iron concentration; MRS; quantitative; DENSITY FAT-FRACTION; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; IN-VIVO; HEPATIC STEATOSIS; MRI; DISEASE; T-1; PERFORMANCE; RELAXATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.29021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the precision profile (repeatability and reproducibility) of quantitative STEAM-MRS and to determine the relationships between multiple MR biomarkers of chronic liver disease in subjects with iron overload at both 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T. Methods MRS data were acquired in patients with known or suspected liver iron overload. Two STEAM-MRS sequences (multi-TE and multi-TE-TR) were acquired at both 1.5T and 3T (same day), including test-retest acquisition. Each acquisition enabled estimation of R1, R2, and FWHM (each separately for water and fat); and proton density fat fraction. The test-retest repeatability and reproducibility across acquisition modes (multi-TE vs. multi-TE-TR) of the estimates were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, linear regression, and Bland-Altman analyses. Multi-parametric relationships between parameters at each field strength, across field strengths, and with liver iron concentration were also evaluated using linear and nonlinear regression. Results Fifty-six (n = 56) subjects (10 to 73 years, 37 males/19 females) were successfully recruited. Both STEAM-MRS sequences demonstrated good-to-excellent precision (intraclass correlation coefficient >= 0.81) for the quantification of R1(water), R2(water), FWHMwater, and proton density fat fraction at both 1.5T and 3T. Additionally, several moderate (R-2 = 0.50 to 0.69) to high (R-2 >= 0.70) correlations were observed between biomarkers, across field strengths, and with liver iron concentration. Conclusions Over a broad range of liver iron concentration, STEAM-MRS enables rapid and precise measurement of multiple biomarkers of chronic liver disease. By evaluating the multi-parametric relationships between biomarkers, this work may advance the comprehensive MRS-based assessment of chronic liver disease and may help establish biomarkers of chronic liver disease.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 613
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Balanced left ventricular myocardial SSFP-tagging at 1.5T and 3T
    Markl, M.
    Scherer, S.
    Frydrychowicz, A.
    Burger, D.
    Geibel, A.
    Hennig, J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 60 (03) : 631 - 639
  • [32] BOLD and perfusion fMRI of generalised spike wave activity at 1.5T and 3T
    Hamandi, Khalid
    Laufs, Helmut
    Carmichael, David
    Noeth, Ulrike
    Paul, Joseph Suresh
    Duncan, John
    Lemieux, Louis
    EPILEPSIA, 2006, 47 : 70 - 70
  • [33] Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL
    Rakow-Penner, R
    Daniel, B
    Yu, HZ
    Sawyer-Glover, A
    Glover, GH
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 23 (01) : 87 - 91
  • [34] Applications of dielectric pads, novel materials and resonators in 1.5T and 3T MRI
    Slobozhanyuk, A.
    Zivkovic, I.
    Shchelokova, A.
    Mikhailovskaya, A.
    Sushkov, I.
    Nenasheva, E.
    Melchakova, I.
    Belov, P.
    Webb, A.
    METANANO 2019, 2020, 1461
  • [35] Strengths and Weaknesses of 1.5T and 3T MRS Data in Brain Glioma Classification
    Kounelakis, M. G.
    Dimou, I. N.
    Zervakis, M. E.
    Tsougos, I.
    Tsolaki, E.
    Kousi, E.
    Kapsalaki, E.
    Theodorou, K.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 15 (04): : 647 - 654
  • [36] What you Need to Know About MR Neuroimaging at 1.5T and 3T
    Tanenbaum, L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [37] Whole Brain Volume Measured from 1.5T versus 3T MRI in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
    Chu, Renxin
    Tauhid, Shahamat
    Glanz, Bonnie I.
    Healy, Brian C.
    Kim, Gloria
    Oommen, Vinit V.
    Khalid, Fariha
    Neema, Mohit
    Bakshi, Rohit
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2016, 26 (01) : 62 - 67
  • [38] 7T MR of intracranial pathology: Preliminary observations and comparisons to 3T and 1.5T
    Obusez, Emmanuel C.
    Lowe, Mark
    Oh, Se-Hong
    Wang, Irene
    Bullen, Jennifer
    Ruggieri, Paul
    Hill, Virginia
    Lockwood, Daniel
    Emch, Todd
    Moon, Doksu
    Loy, Gareth
    Lee, Jonathan
    Kiczek, Matthew
    Massand, Manoj
    Statsevych, Volodymyr
    Stultz, Todd
    Jones, Stephen E.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 168 : 459 - 476
  • [39] Cortical Thickness Measurements from 1.5T vs. 3T MRI in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
    Tummala, Subhash
    Chu, Renxin
    Khalid, Fariha
    Dupuy, Sheena
    Tauhid, Shahamat
    Healy, Brian
    Bakshi, Rohit
    NEUROLOGY, 2016, 86
  • [40] Commissioning of a titanium Fletcher applicator for 1.5T and 3T MRI-only based cervical brachytherapy
    De Smet, M.
    Schnerr, R. S.
    Backes, W.
    Warnier, D.
    Claassen-Janssen, F.
    De Rydt, M.
    Hoffmann, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S47 - S48