Luteal phase support for natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: a meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Su, SuQin [1 ]
Zeng, MeiFang [1 ]
Duan, JinLiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Reprod Med Ctr, Guilin, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Luteal phase support; natural cycle; frozen embryo transfer; pregnancy outcome; meta-analysis; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; PROGESTERONE SUPPLEMENTATION; IMPROVE; CRYOPRESERVATION; ENDOMETRIUM; HORMONE; IVF;
D O I
10.1080/09513590.2021.1998438
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose We aimed to evaluate the effect of luteal phase support (LPS) on pregnancy outcome in natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (NC-FET). Method We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase for related literature from start to February 2020. Relative risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in random-effects, fixed-effects models were calculated using Review Manager 5.3. Results Totally 9 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed no significant difference could be found regarding chemical pregnancy rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93-1.22; I-2 = 54%) and miscarriage rate (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.70-1.22; I-2 = 0%) between the LPS groups and no LPS groups in NC-FET. LPS groups has increased the rate of clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.12-1.34; I-2 = 52%) compared with no LPS groups. Subgroup analysis according to trigger administration also showed a significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion LPS might improve the clinical pregnancy rate in NC-FET. HCG trigger for ovulating may result in luteal phase deficiency. LPS subsequently improved clinical pregnancy rate and chemical pregnancy rate for patients undergoing HCG trigger and NC-FET. Retrospectively registered This meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO, PROSPERO ID is CRD42020171758.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 123
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Meta-analysis on luteal phase support - Reply
    Pritts, EA
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (03)
  • [32] Luteal phase support in fresh and frozen embryo transfers
    Greenbaum, Shirley
    Athavale, Ahlad
    Klement, Anat Hershko
    Bentov, Yaakov
    FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2022, 4
  • [33] Embryo transfer and luteal support in natural cycles
    Vlaisavljevic, Veljko
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 14 (06) : 686 - 692
  • [34] Withdrawal of Luteal Phase Support in the Management of Ectopic Pregnancy Following Frozen Embryo Transfer
    Ware, Hannah M.
    Alexander, Vinita M.
    Ratts, Valerie S.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 65 (9-10) : 311 - 314
  • [36] The addition of single dose GnRH agonist to luteal phase support in artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial
    Ye, Hong
    Luo, Xiu
    Pei, Li
    Li, Fujie
    Li, Chunli
    Chen, Yueduo
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Huang, Guoning
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 (07) : 618 - 622
  • [37] The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review
    Almohammadi, Abdulla
    Raveendran, Ainharan
    Black, Mairead
    Maheshwari, Abha
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2023, 308 (02) : 341 - 350
  • [38] The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review
    Abdulla Almohammadi
    Ainharan Raveendran
    Mairead Black
    Abha Maheshwari
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 308 : 341 - 350
  • [39] The impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy outcomes in relation to serum progesterone levels on the day of frozen embryo transfer in natural cycles
    Roelens, C.
    Pais, F.
    Mackens, S.
    Van Landuyt, L.
    De Vos, M.
    Tournaye, H.
    Drakopoulos, P.
    Blockeel, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I503 - I504
  • [40] Stimulated cycle versus artificial cycle for frozen embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a Meta-analysis
    Zeng, Mei Fang
    Zhou, Xin
    Duan, Jin Liang
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 (04) : 294 - 299