The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review

被引:6
|
作者
Almohammadi, Abdulla [1 ]
Raveendran, Ainharan [2 ]
Black, Mairead [3 ]
Maheshwari, Abha [4 ]
机构
[1] Sidra Med Hosp, Dept Reprod Med, Doha, Qatar
[2] Aberdeen Matern Hosp, Aberdeen Royal Infirm, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen Matern Hosp, Aberdeen Ctr Womens Hlth Res, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Aberdeen Matern Hosp, Aberdeen Fertil Ctr, Reprod Med, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
Luteal phase support; Frozen embryo transfer; Progesterone; Live birth; Miscarriage; LOW SERUM PROGESTERONE; TRANSFER CYCLES; ARTIFICIAL CYCLES; INFERTILITY; SUPPLEMENTATION; DYDROGESTERONE; FRESH;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-022-06674-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer. Design Systematic review. Patients Women undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET). Interventions We conducted an extensive database search of Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Trials Register using relevant keywords and their combinations to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the routes (i.e., oral, vaginal, intramuscular) of progesterone administration for luteal phase support (LPS) in artificial FET. Main outcome measures Clinical pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage. Results Four RCTs with 3245 participants undergoing artificial endometrial preparation (EP) cycles during FET were found to be eligible. Four trials compared vaginal progesterone with intramuscular progesterone and two trials compared vaginal progesterone with oral progesterone. One study favored of vaginal versus oral progesterone for clinical pregnancy rates (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22-0.92) and other study favored intramuscular versus vaginal progesterone for clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.21-1.76) and live birth rates (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.28-2.05). Tabulation of overall evidence strength assessment showed low-quality evidence on the basis that for each outcome-comparison pair, there were deficiencies in either directness of outcome measurement or study quality. Conclusion There was little consensus and evidence was heterogeneous on the optimal route of administration of progesterone for LPS during FET in artificial EP cycles. This warrants more trials, indirect comparisons, and network meta-analyses. PROPERO No CRD42021251017.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 350
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review
    Abdulla Almohammadi
    Ainharan Raveendran
    Mairead Black
    Abha Maheshwari
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 308 : 341 - 350
  • [2] Optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in frozen embryo transfer cycle : systematic review
    Almohammadi, A.
    Black, M.
    Maheshwari, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I484 - I484
  • [3] Luteal Phase Support for Frozen Embryo Transfers: Does Route of Progesterone Administration Make a Difference?
    Leonard, P. H.
    Hokenstad, A. N.
    Khan, Z.
    Asante, A.
    Morbeck, D. E.
    Coddington, C. C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (03) : S33 - S34
  • [4] Luteal phase support for frozen embryo transfer cycles: intramuscular or vaginal progesterone?
    Casper, Robert F.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 101 (03) : 627 - 628
  • [5] Progesterone Support After Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET): Does Route of Administration Improve Outcome?
    Coddington, C. C.
    Hughes, P. M.
    Morbeck, D. E.
    Jensen, J. R.
    Daftary, G. S.
    Rollene, N. L.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (04) : S19 - S19
  • [6] Luteal phase support in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles
    Pabuccu, Emre
    Pabuccu, Recai
    Gurgan, Timur
    Tavmergen, Erol
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 49 (10)
  • [7] Serum luteal phase progesterone in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer in assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Melo, Pedro
    Chung, Yealin
    Pickering, Oonagh
    Price, Malcolm J.
    Fishel, Simon
    Khairy, Mohammed
    Kingsland, Charles
    Lowe, Philip
    Petsas, Georgios
    Rajkhowa, Madhurima
    Sephton, Victoria
    Tozer, Amanda
    Wood, Simon
    Labarta, Elena
    Wilcox, Mark
    Devall, Adam
    Gallos, Ioannis
    Coomarasamy, Arri
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (06) : 1534 - 1556
  • [8] Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT
    Zareii, Afsoon
    Davoodi, Sara
    Alborzi, Mahshid
    Moghadam, Marzieh Eslami
    Askary, Elham
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 19 (10) : 863 - 872
  • [9] The effect of progesterone supplementation for luteal phase support in natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
    Jiang, Yanbiao
    Wang, Liyan
    Shen, Haofei
    Wang, Bin
    Wu, Jingyuan
    Hu, Kaiyan
    Wang, Yiqing
    Ma, Bin
    Zhang, Xuehong
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 119 (04) : 597 - 605
  • [10] Mode of Luteal Phase Progesterone Support After Frozen Embryo Transfer Does Not Affect Live Birth Rates
    Wambach, C.
    Ambartsumyan, G.
    Surrey, M.
    Hill, D.
    Danzer, H.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (04) : S26 - S26