A comparison of the different features of quadripolar left ventricular pacing leads to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:5
|
作者
Antoniadis, Antonios P. [1 ]
Behar, Jonathan M.
Sieniewicz, Ben
Gould, Justin
Niederer, Steven
Rinaldi, Christopher A.
机构
[1] St Thomas Hosp, Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Cardiovasc Dept, 6th Floor East Wing,Westminster Bridge Rd, London SE1 7EH, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Quadripolar left ventricular leads; cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; biventricular pacing; multisite pacing; PHRENIC-NERVE STIMULATION; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; ACUTE HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE; FOLLOW-UP; IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATOR; MECHANICAL DYSSYNCHRONY; MULTISITE; IMPROVES; MULTICENTER; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/17434440.2017.1369404
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Introduction: Cardiac Resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves the quality of life and reduces morbidity and mortality of certain patients with heart failure. However, not all patients respond positively after CRT and about one third of cases do not experience benefit. Suboptimal biventricular pacing may account for this and quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads have emerged in the last years to address issues relating to inadequate delivery of CRT. Areas covered: This review article concisely summarizes the main technical characteristics of the quadripolar LV leads either currently available in the market today or under final stages of development. Focus is given in recent advancements in the area and challenging aspects and controversies, future implications as well as opportunities for further development. Expert commentary: Quadripolar LV pacing leads have now become the standard of care in CRT. Currently a multitude of lead options is available to the clinician. The selection process of the most appropriate lead is far from the 'one size fits all' concept. Further development of quadripolar LV leads is currently ongoing and it is anticipated to contribute towards the release of more technologically advantageous leads which will enable the delivery of optimal CRT therapy with the lowest rate of complications.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 706
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Heart failure clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization with quadripolar versus bipolar left ventricular leads
    Mariana Martinho, M.
    Grade Santos, J.
    Ferreira, B.
    Almeida, S.
    Miranda, R.
    Cale, R.
    Santos Cunha, D.
    Mirinha Luz, J.
    Ilchyshyn, N.
    Baltazar, O.
    Budzak, K.
    Briosa, A.
    Sebaiti, D.
    Brandao Alves, L.
    Pereira, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 : 12 - 12
  • [42] Implant Characteristics of Quadripolar and Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Results from the Attain Success Japan Study
    Ando, Kenji
    Kanda, Shigetaka
    Miura, Fumiharu
    Ashikaga, Keiichi
    Ehara, Natsuhiko
    Sakai, Yoshiaki
    Furukawa, Toshihito
    Yoshimura, Hiroyuki
    Adachi, Kazumasa
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 59 (05) : 1002 - 1007
  • [43] Safety of magnetic resonance imaging scanning in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators incorporating quadripolar left ventricular leads
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    Vitoff, Paji J.
    Nair, Devi G.
    Bernstein, Robert
    Mountantonakis, Stavros E.
    Rapacciuolo, Antonio
    Carter, Nathan
    Tse, Hung Fat
    Green, Ulrika Birgersdotter
    HEART RHYTHM, 2020, 17 (12) : 2064 - 2071
  • [44] OUTCOMES IN QUADRIPOLAR VS BIPOLAR LEFT VENTRICULAR LEADS IN CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY (CRT): A META-ANALYSIS OF SEVEN STUDIES
    Zaidi, S. I. M.
    Panchal, H. B.
    Khan, A. A.
    Murtaza, G.
    Rahman, Z. U.
    Baloch, Z. Q.
    Mungo, N.
    Ramu, V.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 137 : 245 - 245
  • [45] Alternative left ventricular pacing approaches for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Galand, Vincent
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Leclercq, Christophe
    HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (08) : 1281 - 1289
  • [46] Feasibility of left ventricular endocardial lead pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Algazzar, Alaa Solaiman
    Taha, Mohamed Osama
    Katta, Azza Ali
    El Abbady, Asmaa
    Lotfy, Heba Abdelmoteleb
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (02): : 53 - 55
  • [47] Long-term comparison of coronary venous leads versus epicardial leads for left-ventricular pacing in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Koos, R
    Sinha, AM
    Markus, KU
    Breithardt, OA
    Mischke, K
    Zarse, M
    Greiser, M
    Stellbrink, C
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 398 - 398
  • [48] Left bundle branch pacing vs ventricular septal pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Chen, Jingjing
    Ezzeddine, Fatima M.
    Liu, Xiaoke
    Vaidya, Vaibhav
    McLeod, Christopher J.
    Valverde, Arturo M.
    Munoz, Freddy Del-Carpio
    Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
    Madhavan, Malini
    Killu, Ammar M.
    Mulpuru, Siva K.
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2024, 5 (03): : 150 - 157
  • [49] High incidence of suboptimal location of left ventricular pacing leads in patients who failed cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Liao, K. K.
    D'Cunba, J.
    John, R.
    Joyce, L.
    Boyle, A.
    Missov, E.
    Colvin-Adams, M.
    Bolman, R. M., III
    Miller, L.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 25 (02): : S71 - S71
  • [50] Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP)
    Forleo, Giovanni B.
    Santini, Luca
    Giammaria, Massimo
    Potenza, Domenico
    Curnis, Antonio
    Calabrese, Vito
    Ricciardi, Danilo
    D'agostino, Carlo
    Notarstefano, Pasquale
    Ribatti, Valentina
    Morani, Giovanni
    Mantica, Massimo
    Di Biase, Luigi
    Bertaglia, Emanuele
    Calo, Leonardo
    Zanon, Francesco
    EUROPACE, 2017, 19 (07): : 1170 - 1177