This article assesses a wide range of alternative proposals for post-2012 international climate policy regimes. We believe that these proposals will serve as a basis for debates about how to configure post-2012 climate policy. The article characterizes and assesses the policy proposals along the lines of five key policy dilemmas. We argue that (1) many proposals have ideas on how to reduce emissions, but fewer have a solution on how to stimulate technical innovation; (2) many proposals formulate climate policy in isolation, while there are fewer proposals that try to mainstream climate policies in other policy areas; (3) many proposals advocate market-based solutions, while fewer realize that there are certain drawbacks to this solution especially at the international level; (4) most proposals have a preference for a UN-based regime, while a more fragmented regime, based on regional and sectoral arrangements may be emerging; and (5) most proposals have ideas about mitigation, but not many have creative ideas on how to integrate mitigation with adaptation.
机构:
Deutsch Gesell Tech Zusammenarbeit GmbH, German Tech Cooperat, Div Water Energy Transport 44, D-65726 Eschborn, GermanyWuppertal Inst Climate, Wuppertal, Germany
机构:
East West Ctr, Res Program, Honolulu, HI 96848 USA
Fudan Univ, Ctr Energy Econ & Strategy Studies, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
Peking Univ, China Ctr Urban & Reg Dev Res, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
Chinese Acad Social Sci, Ctr Environm & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaEast West Ctr, Res Program, Honolulu, HI 96848 USA
机构:
Univ Calif San Diego, Lab Int Law & Regulat, Sch Int Relat & Pacific Studies, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Ctr Ind Dev & Environm Governance, Beijing 100084, Peoples R ChinaUniv Calif San Diego, Lab Int Law & Regulat, Sch Int Relat & Pacific Studies, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA