Post-2012 climate policy dilemmas: a review of proposals

被引:14
|
作者
Kuik, Onno [1 ]
Aerts, Jeroen [1 ]
Berkhout, Frans [1 ]
Biermann, Frank [1 ]
Bruggink, Jos [1 ,2 ]
Gupta, Joyeeta [1 ,3 ]
Tol, Richard S. J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Fac Earth & Life Sci, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Energy Res Ctr Netherlands, Petten, Netherlands
[3] UNESCO, IHE Inst Water Educ, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
adaptation; climate change policy; climate policy frameworks; energy policies; mitigation; policy design; policy measures; post-2012; negotiations;
D O I
10.3763/cpol.2007.0333
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article assesses a wide range of alternative proposals for post-2012 international climate policy regimes. We believe that these proposals will serve as a basis for debates about how to configure post-2012 climate policy. The article characterizes and assesses the policy proposals along the lines of five key policy dilemmas. We argue that (1) many proposals have ideas on how to reduce emissions, but fewer have a solution on how to stimulate technical innovation; (2) many proposals formulate climate policy in isolation, while there are fewer proposals that try to mainstream climate policies in other policy areas; (3) many proposals advocate market-based solutions, while fewer realize that there are certain drawbacks to this solution especially at the international level; (4) most proposals have a preference for a UN-based regime, while a more fragmented regime, based on regional and sectoral arrangements may be emerging; and (5) most proposals have ideas about mitigation, but not many have creative ideas on how to integrate mitigation with adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 336
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Talks to continue on post-2012 emission cuts
    不详
    TCE, 2006, (776): : 5 - 5
  • [32] Nordic air quality co-benefits from European post-2012 climate policies
    Rypdal, Kristin
    Rive, Nathan
    Astrom, Stefan
    Karvosenoja, Niko
    Aunan, Kristin
    Bak, Jesper L.
    Kupiainen, Kaarle
    Kukkonen, Jaakko
    ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (12) : 6309 - 6322
  • [33] Options for including land use in a climate agreement post-2012: improving the Kyoto Protocol approach
    Schlamadinger, Bernhard
    Johns, Tracy
    Ciccarese, Lorenzo
    Braun, Matthias
    Sato, Atsushi
    Senyaz, Ahmet
    Stephens, Peter
    Takahashi, Masamichi
    Zhang, Xiaoquan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2007, 10 (04) : 295 - 305
  • [34] LULUCF in the post-2012 regime: fixing the problems of the past?
    Macintosh, Andrew Kerr
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2012, 12 (03) : 341 - 355
  • [35] Barriers to sugar mill cogeneration in India: Insights into the structure of post-2012 climate financing instruments
    Haya, Barbara
    Ranganathan, Malini
    Kirpekar, Sujit
    CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 1 (01) : 66 - 81
  • [36] Inter-sectoral determinants of forest policy: the power of deforesting actors in post-2012 Brazil
    Kroger, Markus
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 77 : 24 - 32
  • [37] Including adaptation costs and climate change damages in evaluating post-2012 burden-sharing regimes
    Hof, Andries F.
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2010, 15 (01) : 19 - 40
  • [38] Including adaptation costs and climate change damages in evaluating post-2012 burden-sharing regimes
    Andries F. Hof
    Michel G. J. den Elzen
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2010, 15 : 19 - 40
  • [40] Differentiation of countries' future commitments in a post-2012 climate regime An assessment of the "South-North Dialogue" Proposal
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    Hoehne, Niklas
    Brouns, Bernd
    Winkler, Harald
    Ott, Herrmann E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2007, 10 (03) : 185 - 203