Comparison of outcomes for laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer

被引:83
|
作者
Zhao, Yongliang [1 ,3 ]
Yu, Peiwu [1 ,3 ]
Hao, Yingxue [1 ,3 ]
Qian, Feng [1 ,3 ]
Tang, Bo [1 ,3 ]
Shi, Yan [1 ,3 ]
Luo, Huaxing [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yanqi [2 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Southwest Hosp, Chongqing 400038, Peoples R China
[2] Third Mil Med Univ, Dept Hlth Stat, Chongqing 400038, Peoples R China
[3] Third Mil Med Univ, Ctr Minimal Invas Gastrointestinal Surg, Southwest Hosp, Chongqing 400038, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2011年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
Advanced gastric cancer; Distal subtotal gastrectomy; Laparoscopic surgery; Lymph node dissection; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; D2; LYMPHADENECTOMY; EXPERIENCE; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-011-1652-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopically assisted gastric surgery has become an option for the treatment of early gastric cancer. However, the feasibility and safety of laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer has rarely been studied. This study evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for advanced gastric cancer. The study retrospectively analyzed the clinical and follow-up data for 346 cases after LADG and for 313 cases after conventional open distal gastrectomy (ODG) used to treat advanced gastric cancer from January 2004 to June 2009 at the authors' hospital. The surgical safety, postoperative complications, survival rate, and recurrence and metastasis of cancer were compared between the LADG and ODG groups. The average time for the LADG and ODG procedures did not differ significantly (211 +/- A 56 vs 204 +/- A 41 min), but bleeding during the operation and incision length in the LADG group were significantly less than in the ODG group. The proximal and distal margins of tumors were, respectively, 6.25 +/- A 2.04 and 5.68 +/- A 1.71 cm in the LADG group compared with 6.29 +/- A 2.11 and 5.62 +/- A 1.59 cm in the ODG group. Neither intergroup difference was significant. The number of lymph node dissections also was similar in the two groups: 33.2 +/- A 12.5 in the LADG group and 32.8 +/- A 15.6 in the ODG group. The incidence of postoperative complications in the LADG group (6.7%) was significantly lower than in the ODG group (13.1%). During the follow-up period of 6 to 72 months (average, 37 months), the survival rates were 87.2% at 1 year, 57.2% at 3 years, and 50.30% at 5 years in the LADG group compared with 87.1% at 1 year, 54.1% at 3 years, and 49.2% at 5 years in the ODG group (all similar between the groups). The differences in recurrence and metastasis between the two groups were not statistically significant. Laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer is safe and effective. In this study, it did not differ significantly from open surgery in terms of survival rate or recurrence after surgery based on long-term follow-up evaluation. It can achieve the same beneficial effects as open surgery, and it has the advantages of a small operation wound, less bleeding, good safety, rapid postoperative recovery, and fewer complications.
引用
收藏
页码:2960 / 2966
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term quality of life after laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Ikenaga, N
    Nishihara, K
    Iwashita, T
    Suehara, N
    Mitsuyama, S
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 16 (02): : 119 - 123
  • [42] Case-matched comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Wei Wang
    Ke Chen
    Xiao-Wu Xu
    Yu Pan
    Yi-Ping Mou
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, 19 (23) : 3672 - 3677
  • [43] Case-matched comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Wang, Wei
    Chen, Ke
    Xu, Xiao-Wu
    Pan, Yu
    Mou, Yi-Ping
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (23) : 3672 - 3677
  • [44] Effect of Obesity on Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
    Makino, Hirochika
    Kunisaki, Chikara
    Izumisawa, Yusuke
    Tokuhisa, Motohiko
    Oshima, Takashi
    Nagano, Yasuhiko
    Fujii, Shoichi
    Kimura, Jun
    Takagawa, Ryo
    Kosaka, Takashi
    Ono, Hidetaka A.
    Akiyama, Hirotoshi
    Endo, Itaru
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 102 (02) : 141 - 147
  • [45] Robotic Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Woo, Y.
    Desiderio, J.
    Fong, Y.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 : S42 - S42
  • [46] Comparison of complications after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Clavien–Dindo classification
    Ju-Hee Lee
    Do Joong Park
    Hyung-Ho Kim
    Hyuk-Joon Lee
    Han-Kwang Yang
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 1287 - 1295
  • [47] Comparison efficacy and safety of total laparoscopic gastrectomy and laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy in treatment of gastric cancer
    Li, Long
    Liu, Dong-Yuan
    Leng, Jing
    Tao, Xue-Mei
    Wu, Hui-Qin
    Zhu, Yan-Peng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (06):
  • [48] A Case-Control Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Shuang, Jianbo
    Qi, Shengbin
    Zheng, Jianyong
    Zhao, Qinchuan
    Li, Jipeng
    Kang, Zhenghua
    Hua, Jin
    Du, Jianjun
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2011, 15 (01) : 57 - 62
  • [49] Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy and Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer
    Hagiwara, Ken
    Matsuda, Minoru
    Hayashi, Shigeoki
    Takayama, Tadatoshi
    Ikarashi, Masahito
    Matsuno, Yoritaka
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (03): : 249 - 256
  • [50] Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
    Tetsu Fukunaga
    Naoki Hiki
    Takeshi Kubota
    Souya Nunobe
    Masanori Tokunaga
    Kyoko Nohara
    Takeshi Sano
    Toshiharu Yamaguchi
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 : 2676 - 2682