Case-matched comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

被引:33
|
作者
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Chen, Ke [2 ]
Xu, Xiao-Wu [2 ]
Pan, Yu [2 ]
Mou, Yi-Ping [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Shaoxing Hosp, Shaoxing Peoples Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Stomach neoplasms; Gastrectomy; Laparoscopy; Survival; Case matched study; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPEN SUBTOTAL GASTRECTOMY; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; MULTICENTER; RECURRENCE; RESECTION;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3672
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed by comparing the outcomes of 54 patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with those of 54 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG) between October 2004 and October 2007. The patients' demographic data (age and gender), date of surgery, extent of lymphadenectomy, and differentiation and tumor-node-metastasis stage of the tumor were examined. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery, complications, pathological findings, and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LADG group than in the ODG group (259.3 +/- 46.2 min vs 199.8 +/- 40.85 min; P < 0.05), whereas intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were significantly lower (160.2 +/- 85.9 mL vs 257.8 +/- 151.0 mL; 13.0% vs 24.1%, respectively, P < 0.05). In addition, the time to first flatus, time to initiate oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the LADG group than in the ODG group (3.9 +/- 1.4 d vs 4.4 +/- 1.5 d; 4.6 +/- 1.2 d vs 5.6 +/- 2.1 d; and 9.5 +/- 2.7 d vs 11.1 +/- 4.1 d, respectively; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the LADG group and ODG group with regard to the number of harvested lymph nodes. The median follow-up was 60 mo (range, 5-97 mo). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 94.3%, 90.2%, and 76.7%, respectively, in the LADG group and 89.5%, 84.7%, and 82.3%, respectively, in the ODG group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98.0%, 91.9%, and 81.1%, respectively, in the LADG group and 91.5%, 86.9%, and 82.1%, respectively, in the ODG group. There was no signi.cant difference between the two groups with regard to the survival rate. CONCLUSION: LADG is suitable and minimally invasive for treating distal gastric cancer and can achieve similar long-term results to ODG. (C) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3672 / 3677
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Case-matched comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Wei Wang
    Ke Chen
    Xiao-Wu Xu
    Yu Pan
    Yi-Ping Mou
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, 19 (23) : 3672 - 3677
  • [2] The benefit of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy compared with conventional open distal gastrectomy: A case-matched control study
    Migoh, S
    Hasuda, K
    Nakashima, K
    Anai, H
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 50 (54) : 2251 - 2254
  • [3] The usefulness of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in comparison with that of open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer
    Yano H.
    Monden T.
    Kinuta M.
    Nakano Y.
    Tono T.
    Matsui S.
    Iwazawa T.
    Kanoh T.
    Katsushima S.
    Gastric Cancer, 2001, 4 (2) : 93 - 97
  • [4] Is Laparoscopy-Assisted Total Gastrectomy Feasible for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer? A Case-Matched Study
    Kim, Ki Han
    Kim, Yoo Min
    Kim, Min Chan
    Jung, Ghap Joong
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 30 (4-6) : 348 - 354
  • [5] Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy Compared to Open Distal Gastrectomy in Early Gastric Cancer
    Han, Jae-Hong
    Lee, Hyuk-Joon
    Suh, Yun-Suhk
    Han, Dong-Seok
    Kong, Seong-Ho
    Yang, Han-Kwang
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 28 (04) : 245 - 251
  • [6] Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Kiyama, Teruo
    Fujita, Itsuo
    Kanno, Hitoshi
    Tani, Aya
    Yoshiyuki, Toshiro
    Kato, Shunji
    Tajiri, Takashi
    Barbul, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (10) : 1807 - 1811
  • [7] Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
    Teruo Kiyama
    Itsuo Fujita
    Hitoshi Kanno
    Aya Tani
    Toshiro Yoshiyuki
    Shunji Kato
    Takashi Tajiri
    Adrian Barbul
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2008, 12 : 1807 - 1811
  • [8] Long-term comparison of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer
    Andrew C. Gordon
    Kazuyuki Kojima
    Mikito Inokuchi
    Keiji Kato
    Kenichi Sugihara
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 462 - 470
  • [9] Long-term comparison of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer
    Jung Ho Shim
    Cho Hyun Park
    Kyo Young Song
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 2650 - 2651
  • [10] Long-term comparison of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer
    Gordon, Andrew C.
    Kojima, Kazuyuki
    Inokuchi, Mikito
    Kato, Keiji
    Sugihara, Kenichi
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (02): : 462 - 470