Experimental methods: Eliciting beliefs

被引:35
|
作者
Charness, Gary [1 ]
Gneezy, Uri [2 ]
Rasocha, Vlastimil [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Econ, Rady Sch Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Amsterdam, CREED, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Econ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Experimental methodology; Belief elicitation; Comprehension; Scoring rules; Incentives; PROPER SCORING RULES; SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES; STATED BELIEFS; RISK-AVERSION; TRUTH SERUM; ELICITATION; PREDICTION; FREQUENCY; EXPECTATIONS; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.032
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Expectations are a critical factor in determining actions in a great variety of economic interactions. Hence, being able to measure beliefs is important in many economic environments. In this article, we review the approaches that have been used to measure beliefs and make comparisons of their effectiveness. We also discuss belief elicitation when the truth is not verifiable. We find that introspection (non-incentivized responses) seems to do as well as rather complex incentivized methods. We conjecture that simple and easy-to comprehend incentivized methods are superior to introspection, in fact there are very few studies making such comparisons; this is an avenue for future research. We also discuss ways in which relatively complex methods could be made easier for usage in experimental work. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 256
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF ELICITING THE ANKLE JERK
    SCHWARTZ, RS
    MORRIS, JGL
    CRIMMINS, D
    WILSON, A
    FAHEY, P
    REID, S
    JOFFE, R
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 20 (02): : 116 - 119
  • [42] Eliciting reasons: Empirical methods in priority setting
    Hasman, A
    HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2003, 11 (01) : 41 - 58
  • [43] Eliciting Reasons: Empirical Methods in Priority Setting
    Andreas Hasman
    Health Care Analysis, 2003, 11 : 41 - 58
  • [44] A COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF ELICITING THE ANKLE JERK
    SCHWARTZ, RS
    CRIMMINS, D
    WILSON, A
    FAHEY, P
    JOFFE, R
    MORRIS, JGL
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 18 (03): : 471 - 471
  • [45] Eliciting salient beliefs in research on the theory of planned behaviour: The effect of question wording
    Stephen Sutton
    David P. French
    Susie J. Hennings
    Jo Mitchell
    Nicholas J. Wareham
    Simon Griffin
    Wendy Hardeman
    Ann Louise Kinmonth
    Current Psychology, 2003, 22 : 234 - 251
  • [46] Eliciting psychiatrists' beliefs about side effects of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs
    Patel, M
    Nikolaou, V
    David, AS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2003, 7 (02) : 117 - 120
  • [47] Eliciting salient beliefs in research on the theory of planned behaviour: The effect of question wording
    Sutton, S
    French, DP
    Hennings, SJ
    Mitchell, J
    Wareham, NJ
    Griffin, S
    Hardeman, W
    Kinmonth, AL
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 22 (03) : 234 - 251
  • [48] Eliciting ambiguous beliefs using constructed ambiguous acts: Alpha-maxmin
    Bose, Subir
    Daripa, Arup
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 103
  • [49] Comparison of Methods for Eliciting Multiattribute Utilities for Prostate Cancer
    Phillips, M. H.
    Burt, A.
    Hartzler, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S645 - S645
  • [50] Methods for Eliciting Informative Prior Distributions: A Critical Review
    Falconer, Julia R.
    Frank, Eibe
    Polaschek, Devon L. L.
    Joshi, Chaitanya
    DECISION ANALYSIS, 2022,