Experimental methods: Eliciting beliefs

被引:35
|
作者
Charness, Gary [1 ]
Gneezy, Uri [2 ]
Rasocha, Vlastimil [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Econ, Rady Sch Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Amsterdam, CREED, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Econ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Experimental methodology; Belief elicitation; Comprehension; Scoring rules; Incentives; PROPER SCORING RULES; SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES; STATED BELIEFS; RISK-AVERSION; TRUTH SERUM; ELICITATION; PREDICTION; FREQUENCY; EXPECTATIONS; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.032
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Expectations are a critical factor in determining actions in a great variety of economic interactions. Hence, being able to measure beliefs is important in many economic environments. In this article, we review the approaches that have been used to measure beliefs and make comparisons of their effectiveness. We also discuss belief elicitation when the truth is not verifiable. We find that introspection (non-incentivized responses) seems to do as well as rather complex incentivized methods. We conjecture that simple and easy-to comprehend incentivized methods are superior to introspection, in fact there are very few studies making such comparisons; this is an avenue for future research. We also discuss ways in which relatively complex methods could be made easier for usage in experimental work. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 256
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条