Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review

被引:31
|
作者
Hokke, Stacey [1 ]
Hackworth, Naomi J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Quin, Nina [1 ]
Bennetts, Shannon K. [1 ,2 ]
Win, Hnin Yee [1 ]
Nicholson, Jan M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Zion, Lawrie [5 ]
Lucke, Jayne [6 ,7 ]
Keyzer, Patrick [8 ]
Crawford, Sharinne B. [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Judith Lumley Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Parenting Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] La Trobe Univ, Dept Commun & Media, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] La Trobe Univ, Australian Res Ctr Sex Hlth & Soc, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Law Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; HEALTH RESEARCH; INFORMED-CONSENT; YOUNG-PEOPLE; RESEARCH RECRUITMENT; DECISION-MAKING; E-MAIL; FACEBOOK; ONLINE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0204572
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The internet is an increasingly popular tool in family and child research that is argued to pose new ethical challenges, yet few studies have systematically assessed the ethical issues of engaging parents and children in research online. This scoping review aims to identify and integrate evidence on the ethical issues reported when recruiting, retaining and tracing families and children in research online, and to identify ethical guidelines for internet research. Methods Academic literature was searched using electronic academic databases (Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL and Informit) and handsearching reference lists for articles published in English between January 2006 and February 2016. Grey literature was searched using Google to identify relevant ethical guidelines. Results Sixty-five academic articles were included after screening 3,537 titles and abstracts and 205 full-text articles. Most articles reported using the internet to recruit participants (88%) with few reporting online retention (12%) or tracing (10%). Forty percent commented on ethical issues; the majority did not discuss ethics beyond general consent or approval procedures. Some ethical concerns were specific to engaging minors online, including parental consent, age verification and children's vulnerability. Other concerns applied when engaging any research participant online, including privacy and confidentiality, informed consent and disparities in internet access. Five professional guidelines and 10 university guidelines on internet research ethics were identified. Few academic articles (5%) reported using these guidelines. Conclusions Engaging families and children in research online introduces unique challenges requiring careful consideration. While researchers regarded themselves as responsible for ensuring research is conducted ethically, lack of use of available guidelines and limited academic literature suggests internet research is occurring without suitable guidance. We recommend broad dissemination of ethical guidelines and encourage researchers to report the methodological and ethical issues of using the internet to engage families and children in research.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members
    Hokke, Stacey
    Hackworth, Naomi J.
    Bennetts, Shannon K.
    Nicholson, Jan M.
    Keyzer, Patrick
    Lucke, Jayne
    Zion, Lawrie
    Crawford, Sharinne B.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2020, 15 (1-2) : 12 - 27
  • [42] The New Normal? Revisiting Ethical Issues in Internet Research
    Buchanan, Elizabeth A.
    DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND INTERNET TECHNOLOGY, ICDCIT 2014, 2014, 8337 : 25 - 33
  • [43] Ethical Issues in the Use of Technologies in Education Settings: A Scoping Review
    Marin, Victoria I.
    Tur, Gemma
    EDUCATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY, 2024, 25
  • [44] A systematic scoping review of ethical issues in mentoring in medical schools
    Cheryl Shumin Kow
    Yao Hao Teo
    Yao Neng Teo
    Keith Zi Yuan Chua
    Elaine Li Ying Quah
    Nur Haidah Binte Ahmad Kamal
    Lorraine Hui En Tan
    Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong
    Yun Ting Ong
    Kuang Teck Tay
    Min Chiam
    Stephen Mason
    Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
    BMC Medical Education, 20
  • [45] A systematic scoping review of ethical issues in mentoring in medical schools
    Kow, Cheryl Shumin
    Teo, Yao Hao
    Teo, Yao Neng
    Chua, Keith Zi Yuan
    Quah, Elaine Li Ying
    Kamal, Nur Haidah Binte Ahmad
    Tan, Lorraine Hui En
    Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen
    Ong, Yun Ting
    Tay, Kuang Teck
    Chiam, Min
    Mason, Stephen
    Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [46] Ethical issues in direct-to-consumer healthcare: A scoping review
    Nagappan, Ashwini
    Kalokairinou, Louiza
    Wexler, Anna
    PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 3 (02):
  • [47] Addressing ethical issues in outdoor health practice: a scoping review
    Knowles, Ben
    Marsh, Pauline
    Prehn, Jacob
    Maxwell, Hazel
    JOURNAL OF OUTDOOR AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, 2024, 27 (01) : 7 - 35
  • [48] Ethical issues concerning participants in community surveys of child and adolescent mental disorders
    Lépine, S
    Smolla, N
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2000, 45 (01): : 48 - 54
  • [49] ETHICAL ISSUES IN RESEARCH ON SENSITIVE TOPICS: PARTICIPANTS' EXPERIENCES OF DISTRESS AND BENEFIT
    Decker, Suzanne E.
    Naugle, Amy E.
    Carter-Visscher, Robin
    Bell, Kathryn
    Seifert, Abby
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2011, 6 (03) : 55 - 64
  • [50] Methodological Issues in Rehabilitation Research: A Scoping Review
    Arienti, Chiara
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Minozzi, Silvia
    Tjosvold, Lisa
    Lazzarini, Stefano Giuseppe
    Patrini, Michele
    Negrini, Stefano
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 102 (08): : 1614 - +