Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review

被引:31
|
作者
Hokke, Stacey [1 ]
Hackworth, Naomi J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Quin, Nina [1 ]
Bennetts, Shannon K. [1 ,2 ]
Win, Hnin Yee [1 ]
Nicholson, Jan M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Zion, Lawrie [5 ]
Lucke, Jayne [6 ,7 ]
Keyzer, Patrick [8 ]
Crawford, Sharinne B. [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Judith Lumley Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Parenting Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] La Trobe Univ, Dept Commun & Media, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] La Trobe Univ, Australian Res Ctr Sex Hlth & Soc, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Law Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; HEALTH RESEARCH; INFORMED-CONSENT; YOUNG-PEOPLE; RESEARCH RECRUITMENT; DECISION-MAKING; E-MAIL; FACEBOOK; ONLINE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0204572
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The internet is an increasingly popular tool in family and child research that is argued to pose new ethical challenges, yet few studies have systematically assessed the ethical issues of engaging parents and children in research online. This scoping review aims to identify and integrate evidence on the ethical issues reported when recruiting, retaining and tracing families and children in research online, and to identify ethical guidelines for internet research. Methods Academic literature was searched using electronic academic databases (Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL and Informit) and handsearching reference lists for articles published in English between January 2006 and February 2016. Grey literature was searched using Google to identify relevant ethical guidelines. Results Sixty-five academic articles were included after screening 3,537 titles and abstracts and 205 full-text articles. Most articles reported using the internet to recruit participants (88%) with few reporting online retention (12%) or tracing (10%). Forty percent commented on ethical issues; the majority did not discuss ethics beyond general consent or approval procedures. Some ethical concerns were specific to engaging minors online, including parental consent, age verification and children's vulnerability. Other concerns applied when engaging any research participant online, including privacy and confidentiality, informed consent and disparities in internet access. Five professional guidelines and 10 university guidelines on internet research ethics were identified. Few academic articles (5%) reported using these guidelines. Conclusions Engaging families and children in research online introduces unique challenges requiring careful consideration. While researchers regarded themselves as responsible for ensuring research is conducted ethically, lack of use of available guidelines and limited academic literature suggests internet research is occurring without suitable guidance. We recommend broad dissemination of ethical guidelines and encourage researchers to report the methodological and ethical issues of using the internet to engage families and children in research.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ON SENSITIVITY AND ETHICAL ISSUES IN CHILD WITNESS RESEARCH
    WESTCOTT, HL
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 1994, 18 (03) : 287 - 290
  • [32] Interdisciplinary perspectives: ethical issues and child research
    Hopkins, Peter E.
    Bell, Nancy
    CHILDRENS GEOGRAPHIES, 2008, 6 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [33] CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE - ETHICAL ISSUES FOR THE FAMILY THERAPIST
    HAVERKAMP, B
    DANILUK, JC
    FAMILY RELATIONS, 1993, 42 (02) : 134 - 139
  • [34] ETHICAL ISSUES AFFECTING HUMAN PARTICIPANTS IN COMMUNITY COLLEGE RESEARCH
    Wurtz, Keith
    COMMUNITY COLLEGE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2011, 35 (04) : 301 - 311
  • [35] Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research
    Beskow, LM
    Botkin, JR
    Daly, M
    Juengst, ET
    Lehmann, LS
    Merz, JF
    Pentz, R
    Press, NA
    Ross, LF
    Sugarman, J
    Susswein, LR
    Terry, SF
    Austin, MA
    Burke, W
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2004, 130A (04): : 424 - 431
  • [36] Ethical Issues in Research Involving Participants With Opioid Use Disorder
    Emily Anderson
    Lindsay McNair
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2018, 52 : 280 - 284
  • [37] Ethical Issues in Research Involving Participants With Opioid Use Disorder
    Anderson, Emily
    McNair, Lindsay
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2018, 52 (03) : 280 - 284
  • [38] Ethical issues in family group conferencing research
    Sandell, K
    Waites, C
    2000 NATIONAL ROUNDTABLE ON FAMILY GROUP DECISION MAKING, SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 187 - 193
  • [39] Home truths: ethical issues in family research
    Gabb, Jacqui
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2010, 10 (04) : 461 - 478
  • [40] A REVIEW OF ETHICAL ISSUES IN AIDS RESEARCH
    NDINYAACHOLA, JO
    EAST AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 68 (09) : 735 - 740