A historical comparison of validity standards and validity practices

被引:15
|
作者
Jonson, JL [1 ]
Plake, BS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0013164498058005002
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The present study examined the relationship between the validity theory of the past 50 years with actual validity practices. This process involved the comparison of validity requirements and theory as they appeared in the published test standards (by the American Psychological Association, the American Educational Research Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education) to the practices of measurement professionals. Each of the the four sets of test standards were operationally defined and then compared to information and opinions about validity evidence expressed in the Mental Measurements Yearbook test reviews. Results from this process indicate that the theoretical modifications to the concept of validity have been carried over into validity practice, However, it was also found that operational modifications to the concept of validity have been influenced by validity practice. Therefore, there appears to be a symbiotic relationship between theory and practice on the influence of Validity.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 753
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing the discriminant validity of the leadership practices inventory
    Carless, SA
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 74 : 233 - 239
  • [32] Validity practices in qualitative research in school psychology
    Sabnis, Sujay V. V.
    Wolgemuth, Jennifer R. R.
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 45 (02) : 87 - 114
  • [33] Neuropsychological Validity Assessment Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Neuropsychologists and Validity Assessment Experts
    Martin, Phillip K.
    Schroeder, Ryan W.
    Odland, Anthony P.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 40 (02) : 201 - 223
  • [34] Validity in Question: Is Pharmacy Educational Research Meeting the Standards?
    Dell, Kamila A.
    Wantuch, Gwendolyn A.
    Benedict, Neal
    Peeters, Michael J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 89 (02)
  • [35] Changing conceptions of measurement validity:: An update on the new standards
    Goodwin, LD
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2002, 41 (03) : 100 - 106
  • [36] A Comparison Study of Clustering Validity Indices
    Chouikhi, Hasna
    Charrad, Malika
    Ghazzali, Nadia
    2015 GLOBAL SUMMIT ON COMPUTER & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (GSCIT), 2015,
  • [37] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY - A COMPARISON WITH LAPAROSCOPY
    ROTH, J
    MERK, J
    RADIOLOGE, 1988, 28 (09): : 456 - 456
  • [38] A comparison of three symptom validity tests
    Axelrod, B. N.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 23 (06) : 709 - 709
  • [39] A validity study of the SSAGA - a comparison with the SCAN
    Hesselbrock, M
    Easton, C
    Bucholz, KK
    Schuckit, M
    Hesselbrock, V
    ADDICTION, 1999, 94 (09) : 1361 - 1370
  • [40] CAUSAL AND DIAGNOSTIC INFERENCES - A COMPARISON OF VALIDITY
    BURNS, M
    PEARL, J
    ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1981, 28 (03): : 379 - 394