Validity practices in qualitative research in school psychology

被引:2
|
作者
Sabnis, Sujay V. V. [1 ]
Wolgemuth, Jennifer R. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Measurement & Res, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
research methods; methodology; qualitative research; coding; member checking; MIXED METHODS RESEARCH; SOCIAL-JUSTICE; STUDENTS; SUPPORT; EXPERIENCES; EDUCATION; CRITERIA; RIGOR; KINDERGARTEN; CONSULTATION;
D O I
10.1177/01430343231194731
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Validity refers to the extent to which a given study reflects the dominant values of a research community regarding what constitutes "good" research. Methodological texts on qualitative research provide a wide range of criteria and strategies to help qualitative researchers validate their studies. Given the importance of these strategies to establish a study as trustworthy and legitimate, the objective of this study was to understand the strategies commonly used by school psychology researchers in qualitative research. We therefore reviewed qualitative research articles published in seven school psychology journals between 2006 and 2021. We found 15 strategies authors used to enhance the validity of their research. We also found that a strategy could be enacted in many different ways by different researchers depending on the context. We conclude by recommending four ways in which qualitative researchers in school psychology can improve their validation practices.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 114
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条