Replacement of Enterococcus faecalis by Enterococcus faecium as the predominant enterococcus in UK bacteraemias

被引:17
|
作者
Horner, Carolyne [1 ]
Mushtaq, Shazad [2 ]
Allen, Michael [1 ,3 ]
Hope, Russell [2 ]
Gerver, Sarah [2 ]
Longshaw, Christopher [1 ,4 ]
Reynolds, Rosy [5 ]
Woodford, Neil [2 ]
Livermore, David M. [6 ]
机构
[1] British Soc Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, London, England
[3] Merck Sharp & Dohme UK Ltd, London, England
[4] Shion BV, London, England
[5] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Bristol, Avon, England
[6] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
来源
JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE | 2021年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
RESISTANT; EMERGENCE; SPP;
D O I
10.1093/jacamr/dlab185
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives To review temporal changes in the proportions of different Enterococcus species recorded in two UK bacteraemia surveillance systems. Antibiotic resistance trends were also considered. Methods We reviewed data for enterococci from 2001 to 2019 in: (a) the BSAC Resistance Surveillance Programme, which collected up to 7-10 bloodstream enterococci every year from each of 23-39 hospitals in the UK and Ireland and tested these centrally; and (b) PHE bacteraemia surveillance, using routine results from NHS microbiology laboratories in England. Results BSAC surveillance, based upon 206-255 enterococci each year (4486 in total), indicated that the proportion of Enterococcus faecium rose from 31% (212/692) in the period 2001-3 to 51% (354/696) in the period 2017-19, balanced by corresponding falls in the proportion of Enterococcus faecalis. PHE surveillance provided a larger dataset, with >5000 enterococcus reports per year; although its identifications are less precise, it too indicated a rise in the proportion of E. faecium. BSAC surveillance for E. faecium indicated no consistent trends in resistance to ampicillin (>= 86% in all years), vancomycin (annual rates 19%-40%) or high-level resistance to gentamicin (31%-59%). Resistance to vancomycin remained E. faecalis in all years, whilst high-level resistance to gentamicin fell, perhaps partly reflecting the decline of two initially prevalent gentamicin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant clones. Conclusions Both surveillance systems indicate a growing proportion of E. faecium in enterococcal bloodstream infections. This is important because fewer therapeutic options remain against this frequently multiresistant species than against E. faecalis.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enterococcus hirae, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis show different sensitivities to typical biocidal agents used for disinfection
    Suchomel, M.
    Lenhardt, A.
    Kampf, G.
    Grisold, A.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2019, 103 (04) : 435 - 440
  • [42] Antimicrobial Resistant Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, and Other Enterococcus Species Isolated From Foal Feces in Japan
    Sukmawinata, Eddy
    Sato, Wataru
    Uemura, Ryoko
    Sueyoshi, Masuo
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2018, 63 : 51 - 54
  • [43] Comparison of risk factors and outcome in patients with Enterococcus faecalis vs Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia
    Suppola, JP
    Kuikka, A
    Vaara, M
    Valtonen, VV
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 30 (02) : 153 - 157
  • [44] Conjugative transfer of the virulence gene, esp, among isolates of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis
    Oancea, C
    Klare, I
    Witte, W
    Werner, G
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2004, 54 (01) : 232 - 235
  • [45] Occurrence of the van genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from clinical isolates in Korea
    Yang, Jaewook
    Lee, Dolkyung
    Kim, Yuna
    Kang, Byungyong
    Kim, Kyungjae
    Ha, Namjoo
    ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH, 2007, 30 (03) : 329 - 336
  • [46] Pharmacodynamics of Daptomycin against Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis in the Murine Thigh Infection Model
    Kidd, James M.
    Abdelraouf, Kamilia
    Asempa, Tomefa E.
    Humphries, Romney M.
    Nicolau, David P.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 62 (10)
  • [47] Evaluation of a biochemical test scheme for identifying clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium
    Day, AM
    Sandoe, JAT
    Cove, JH
    Phillips-Jones, MK
    LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 33 (05) : 392 - 396
  • [48] Comparison of Health Care-Associated Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis Bloodstream Infections
    Alkan-Ceviker, Sevil
    Gunal, Ozgur
    Koksal, Eda
    Aygun, Cemanur
    Kilic, Suleyman Sirri
    KLIMIK JOURNAL, 2020, 33 (01) : 87 - 90
  • [49] Mechanistic Study of the Effect of Ferulic Acid on Tyramine Production by Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium
    Xue, Linlin
    Wang, Yuan
    Li, Binbin
    Wang, Qingling
    Lu, Shiling
    Shipin Kexue/Food Science, 2019, 40 (22): : 33 - 38
  • [50] FOCUS ON SOME RESISTANCE IN ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECALIS AND ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECIUM ISOLATED IN ITALY
    STEFANI, S
    DAMICO, G
    MACCARRONE, G
    PELLEGRINO, MB
    DIBLASI, N
    RUSSO, G
    NICOLETTI, G
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 5 : 300 - 301