Replacement of Enterococcus faecalis by Enterococcus faecium as the predominant enterococcus in UK bacteraemias

被引:17
|
作者
Horner, Carolyne [1 ]
Mushtaq, Shazad [2 ]
Allen, Michael [1 ,3 ]
Hope, Russell [2 ]
Gerver, Sarah [2 ]
Longshaw, Christopher [1 ,4 ]
Reynolds, Rosy [5 ]
Woodford, Neil [2 ]
Livermore, David M. [6 ]
机构
[1] British Soc Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, London, England
[3] Merck Sharp & Dohme UK Ltd, London, England
[4] Shion BV, London, England
[5] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Bristol, Avon, England
[6] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
来源
JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE | 2021年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
RESISTANT; EMERGENCE; SPP;
D O I
10.1093/jacamr/dlab185
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives To review temporal changes in the proportions of different Enterococcus species recorded in two UK bacteraemia surveillance systems. Antibiotic resistance trends were also considered. Methods We reviewed data for enterococci from 2001 to 2019 in: (a) the BSAC Resistance Surveillance Programme, which collected up to 7-10 bloodstream enterococci every year from each of 23-39 hospitals in the UK and Ireland and tested these centrally; and (b) PHE bacteraemia surveillance, using routine results from NHS microbiology laboratories in England. Results BSAC surveillance, based upon 206-255 enterococci each year (4486 in total), indicated that the proportion of Enterococcus faecium rose from 31% (212/692) in the period 2001-3 to 51% (354/696) in the period 2017-19, balanced by corresponding falls in the proportion of Enterococcus faecalis. PHE surveillance provided a larger dataset, with >5000 enterococcus reports per year; although its identifications are less precise, it too indicated a rise in the proportion of E. faecium. BSAC surveillance for E. faecium indicated no consistent trends in resistance to ampicillin (>= 86% in all years), vancomycin (annual rates 19%-40%) or high-level resistance to gentamicin (31%-59%). Resistance to vancomycin remained E. faecalis in all years, whilst high-level resistance to gentamicin fell, perhaps partly reflecting the decline of two initially prevalent gentamicin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant clones. Conclusions Both surveillance systems indicate a growing proportion of E. faecium in enterococcal bloodstream infections. This is important because fewer therapeutic options remain against this frequently multiresistant species than against E. faecalis.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antimicrobial Action of Oleanolic Acid on Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis
    Kim, Sejeong
    Lee, Heeyoung
    Lee, Soomin
    Yoon, Yohan
    Choi, Kyoung-Hee
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [32] Erratum to: Investigating the mobilome in clinically important lineages of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis
    Theresa Mikalsen
    Torunn Pedersen
    Rob Willems
    Teresa M. Coque
    Guido Werner
    Ewa Sadowy
    Willem van Schaik
    Lars Bogø Jensen
    María Victoria Francia
    Arnfinn Sundsfjord
    Kristin Hegstad
    BMC Genomics, 16
  • [33] The tyrosine decarboxylation test does not differentiate Enterococcus faecalis from Enterococcus faecium
    Marcobal, A
    Rivas, BDL
    García-Moruno, E
    Muñoz, R
    SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 27 (04) : 423 - 426
  • [34] Antimicrobial Resistance of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from poultry carcasses
    Borges de Campos, Ana Claudia F.
    Souza, Nara R.
    da Silva, Patricia H. C.
    Santana, Angela P.
    PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA, 2013, 33 (05): : 575 - 580
  • [35] Presence of virulence factors in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium susceptible and resistant to vancomycin
    Comerlato, Carolina Baldisserotto
    Carvalho de Resende, Mariah Costa
    Caierao, Juliana
    d'Azevedo, Pedro Alves
    MEMORIAS DO INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ, 2013, 108 (05): : 590 - 595
  • [36] VanD-type vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis
    Depardieu, F
    Kolbert, M
    Pruul, H
    Bell, J
    Courvalin, P
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2004, 48 (10) : 3892 - 3904
  • [37] Fitness costs of various mobile genetic elements in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis
    Starikova, Irina
    Al-Haroni, Mohammed
    Werner, Guido
    Roberts, Adam P.
    Sorum, Vidar
    Nielsen, Kaare M.
    Johnsen, Pal J.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2013, 68 (12) : 2755 - 2765
  • [38] SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CLINICAL ISOLATES OF ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECIUM AND ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECALIS
    LOUIE, M
    SIMOR, AE
    SZETO, S
    PATEL, M
    KREISWIRTH, B
    LOW, DE
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (01) : 41 - 45
  • [39] Performance of commercial methods for linezolid susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis
    Dejoies, Loren
    Boukthir, Sarrah
    de Ponfilly, Gauthier Pean
    Le Guen, Ronan
    Zouari, Asma
    Potrel, Sophie
    Collet, Anais
    Auger, Gabriel
    Jacquier, Herve
    Fihman, Vincent
    Dortet, Laurent
    Cattoir, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 75 (09) : 2587 - 2593
  • [40] Relation of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolates from Foods and Clinical Specimens
    Templer, S. P.
    Rohner, P.
    Baumgartner, A.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2008, 71 (10) : 2100 - 2104