Will the liberalization of intermediate trade restrain corporate pollution emissions?-Empirical evidence from Chinese micro-enterprises

被引:4
|
作者
Yi, Yingying [1 ]
Yu, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Sun, Xiaotong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Econ, 9 Wenyuan Rd, Nanjing 210046, Peoples R China
关键词
Liberalization of trade in intermediate goods; corporate pollution; environmental regulations; trade methods; INPUTS; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2021.2010644
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on the integrated data of the industrial pollution database, the customs database and the Chinese industrial enterprise database from 2000 to 2012, the system GMM Model is used to estimate the relationship between the liberalization of intermediate goods trade and corporate pollution emissions. Also, it is used to explore whether environmental regulations can achieve the reduction of intermediate goods trade effect. The results show that by dividing intermediate trade liberalization into importation and exportation, it aggravates the pollution emission of enterprises, while environmental regulations alleviate it. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the importation of intermediate products aggravates enterprise pollution in processing trade mode and reduces pollution in general trade mode. While exportation of intermediate products aggravates pollution in both of these two trade modes and only processing one is statistically significant. Geographically, both importing and exporting of intermediate goods aggravate enterprise emissions in the East and Midwest. More specifically, importation plays a bigger role in the Midwestern areas as exportation does in the eastern place. Furthermore, we discover that different industries differ greatly by dividing them into 11 categories. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the trade structure of intermediate goods while considering the different development stages of different regions at the same time.
引用
收藏
页码:3521 / 3536
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Use of the Internet and the productivity of Micro-enterprises: Evidence from the Peruvian Case (2007-2010)
    Huaroto, Cesar
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES & INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 8 (04): : 129 - 144
  • [42] The impact of trade liberalization on individual fertility intention: Empirical evidence from China
    Li, Hongyang
    Shao, Min
    Shi, Xinjie
    POPULATION SPACE AND PLACE, 2022, 28 (06)
  • [43] FDI and labour share of home-country: empirical evidence from micro data of Chinese enterprises
    Jia, Nisha
    Han, Yonghui
    Peng, Keming
    Lei, Hongzhen
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2019, 32 (01): : 1320 - 1335
  • [44] Determinants of the Level of Informality of Informal Micro-Enterprises: Some Evidence from the City of Lahore, Pakistan
    Williams, Colin C.
    Shahid, Muhammad S.
    Martinez, Alvaro
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 84 : 312 - 325
  • [45] Determinants of technical and allocative efficiency of micro-enterprises: Firm-level evidence from Nigeria
    Ajibefun, IA
    Daramola, AG
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-REVUE AFRICAINE DE DEVELOPPEMENT, 2003, 15 (2-3): : 353 - 395
  • [46] The power influence of executives and corporate investment efficiency: empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises
    Yewei Huang
    Junqin Qiu
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [47] The power influence of executives and corporate investment efficiency: empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises
    Huang, Yewei
    Qiu, Junqin
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [48] Export trade and smog pollution: Empirical evidence from China
    Bai, Junhong
    Yu, Xuewei
    GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2021, 52 (01) : 224 - 242
  • [49] Export scope, managerial efficiency, and trade liberalization: Evidence from Chinese firms
    Qiu, Larry D.
    Yu, Miaojie
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 177 : 71 - 90
  • [50] Measured skill premia and input trade liberalization: Evidence from Chinese firms
    Chen, Bo
    Yu, Miaojie
    Yu, Zhihao
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 109 : 31 - 42