Will the liberalization of intermediate trade restrain corporate pollution emissions?-Empirical evidence from Chinese micro-enterprises

被引:4
|
作者
Yi, Yingying [1 ]
Yu, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Sun, Xiaotong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Econ, 9 Wenyuan Rd, Nanjing 210046, Peoples R China
关键词
Liberalization of trade in intermediate goods; corporate pollution; environmental regulations; trade methods; INPUTS; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2021.2010644
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on the integrated data of the industrial pollution database, the customs database and the Chinese industrial enterprise database from 2000 to 2012, the system GMM Model is used to estimate the relationship between the liberalization of intermediate goods trade and corporate pollution emissions. Also, it is used to explore whether environmental regulations can achieve the reduction of intermediate goods trade effect. The results show that by dividing intermediate trade liberalization into importation and exportation, it aggravates the pollution emission of enterprises, while environmental regulations alleviate it. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the importation of intermediate products aggravates enterprise pollution in processing trade mode and reduces pollution in general trade mode. While exportation of intermediate products aggravates pollution in both of these two trade modes and only processing one is statistically significant. Geographically, both importing and exporting of intermediate goods aggravate enterprise emissions in the East and Midwest. More specifically, importation plays a bigger role in the Midwestern areas as exportation does in the eastern place. Furthermore, we discover that different industries differ greatly by dividing them into 11 categories. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the trade structure of intermediate goods while considering the different development stages of different regions at the same time.
引用
收藏
页码:3521 / 3536
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Digital finance and corporate environmental strategy upgrade: empirical evidence from Chinese heavily polluting enterprises
    Zhang, Hong
    Lin, Hui
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2024, 36 (12) : 4098 - 4112
  • [32] Processing trade, export intensity, and input trade liberalization: evidence from Chinese firms
    Tian, Wei
    Yu, Miaojie
    JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2015, 20 (03) : 444 - 464
  • [33] Product market competition and the value of corporate cash: Evidence from trade liberalization
    Alimov, Azizjon
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2014, 25 : 122 - 139
  • [34] Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters
    Khandelwal, Amit K.
    Schott, Peter K.
    Wei, Shang-Jin
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (06): : 2169 - 2195
  • [35] Input trade liberalization and import switching: Evidence from Chinese firms
    Tian, Wei
    Yu, Miaojie
    REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 27 (04) : 1002 - 1020
  • [36] Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Industries
    Hu, Albert Guangzhou
    Liu, Zhengning
    REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 22 (03) : 488 - 512
  • [37] Robot adoption and corporate pollution emissions: Evidence from China
    Xu, Rui
    Zhang, Hao
    Han, Minghui
    Yang, Leo Yang
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2025, 90
  • [38] Import Liberalization of Intermediates and Environment: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing
    He, Ling-Yun
    Wang, Liang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [39] The Construction of Free Trade Zones Drives Digital Transformation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Enterprises
    Wang, Weilong
    Xiao, Deheng
    Wang, Jianlong
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [40] A Study on Relationship of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Value in Listed Companies: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Real Estate Enterprises
    Chen, Si
    Wang, Xiaowei
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 903 - 906