A Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Process-Based Digitalisation Opportunity and Priority Assessment (DOPA)

被引:1
|
作者
Yildirim, Nihan [1 ]
Siyahi, Birden Tulug [2 ]
Ozbek, Oguz [2 ]
Ahioglu, Imran [1 ]
Kahya, Almira Selin [3 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Biligopex, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
关键词
AHP; Digital Transformation; Digitalisation Roadmap; FAHP; FMEA; Industry; 4.0; Priority Setting; Quality Management; Technology Selection; TOPSIS; Voice of Customer; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; FAILURE MODE; FUZZY; TOPSIS; AHP; SELECTION; SOFTWARE; FMEA;
D O I
10.4018/IJBAN.298018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the introduction of Industry 4.0 and supporting technologies, both service and manufacturing companies faced external and internal pressure for "going digital." In many cases, companies cannot decide on the digitalisation initiative due to preliminary groundwork to justify the required investment. For digitalisation priority setting under uncertain benefits, available digital technology selection methods lack the focus on process needs and do not fully utilise quality management tools in the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework. In this context, this study aims to propose a novel, context-independent, and process-based digital opportunity priority assessment (DOPA) methodology. The proposed approach utilizes critical to quality measures (CTQs), the causes with potential adversary effects as alternatives, and the importance, frequency, and digital control level of CTQs as the criteria in TOPSIS. AHP and Fuzzy AHP validate CTQ importance criteria. The study also presents a real industry application to validate the proposed model.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cubic bipolar fuzzy aggregation operator with priority degree with multi-criteria decision-making
    Jamil, N.
    Riaz, M.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2024, 31 (05) : 388 - 416
  • [42] A decision-making framework under probabilistic linguistic term set for multi-criteria group decision-making problem
    Krishankumar, R.
    Saranya, R.
    Nethra, R. P.
    Ravichandran, K. S.
    Kar, Samarjit
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (06) : 5783 - 5795
  • [43] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [44] A Multi-Criteria and Multi-Agent Framework for supporting complex decision-making processes
    Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti
    René Bañares-Alcántara
    Eduardo Cleto Pires
    Sonia Valle Walter Borges de Oliveira
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2022, 31 : 1025 - 1050
  • [45] A Multi-Criteria and Multi-Agent Framework for supporting complex decision-making processes
    Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua
    Banares-Alcantara, Rene
    Pires, Eduardo Cleto
    de Oliveira, Sonia Valle Walter Borges
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2022, 31 (05) : 1025 - 1050
  • [46] A new web-based framework development for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making
    Hanine, Mohamed
    Boutkhoum, Omar
    Tikniouine, Abdessadek
    Agouti, Tarik
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [47] Data Asset Quality Evaluation Framework Based on a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method
    Xu, Tao
    You, Xiaoyue
    Yang, Miying
    Shi, Yongjiang
    Mao, Renjie
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 41 (02) : 801 - 820
  • [48] A CAR-PROMETHEE-based multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainability assessment of renewable energy technologies in Morocco
    Gouraizim, Mohamed
    Makan, Abdelhadi
    El Ouarghi, Hossain
    OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (03) : 1343 - 1358
  • [49] A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework in Electrical Utilities Based on Gray Number Approach
    Jahani, Fatemeh
    Mohammadi, Mohammad
    Pourdaryaei, Alireza
    Shayesteh, Ebrahim
    Karimi, Mazaher
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 121508 - 121519
  • [50] Integrated value engineering and multi-criteria decision-making process in BIM framework for pipe materials selection
    Aldrees, Rashed M.
    Al-Gahtani, Khalid S.
    Alsugair, Abdullah M.
    Aljadhai, Saad I.
    Alsanabani, Naif
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2025, 29 (04)