A Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Process-Based Digitalisation Opportunity and Priority Assessment (DOPA)

被引:1
|
作者
Yildirim, Nihan [1 ]
Siyahi, Birden Tulug [2 ]
Ozbek, Oguz [2 ]
Ahioglu, Imran [1 ]
Kahya, Almira Selin [3 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Biligopex, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
关键词
AHP; Digital Transformation; Digitalisation Roadmap; FAHP; FMEA; Industry; 4.0; Priority Setting; Quality Management; Technology Selection; TOPSIS; Voice of Customer; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; FAILURE MODE; FUZZY; TOPSIS; AHP; SELECTION; SOFTWARE; FMEA;
D O I
10.4018/IJBAN.298018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the introduction of Industry 4.0 and supporting technologies, both service and manufacturing companies faced external and internal pressure for "going digital." In many cases, companies cannot decide on the digitalisation initiative due to preliminary groundwork to justify the required investment. For digitalisation priority setting under uncertain benefits, available digital technology selection methods lack the focus on process needs and do not fully utilise quality management tools in the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework. In this context, this study aims to propose a novel, context-independent, and process-based digital opportunity priority assessment (DOPA) methodology. The proposed approach utilizes critical to quality measures (CTQs), the causes with potential adversary effects as alternatives, and the importance, frequency, and digital control level of CTQs as the criteria in TOPSIS. AHP and Fuzzy AHP validate CTQ importance criteria. The study also presents a real industry application to validate the proposed model.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Linguistic Labels
    Mieszkowicz-Rolka, Alicja
    Rolka, Leszek
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 17TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2022, : 263 - 267
  • [32] The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 115 - 123
  • [33] Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Craft, David
    van Haveren, Rens
    Heijmen, Ben
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 277 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [34] CONSIDERING INTERACTIONS IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Cancer, Vesna
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOR 09, 2009, : 151 - 156
  • [35] Multi-criteria Decision-making in Urban Planning
    Kilnarova, Pavla
    6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 2017, : 94 - 100
  • [36] Pythagorean fuzzy prioritized aggregation operators with priority degrees for multi-criteria decision-making
    Farid, Hafiz Muhammad Athar
    Riaz, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND CYBERNETICS, 2022, 15 (04) : 510 - 539
  • [37] Multi-criteria group decision-making approach with linguistic assessment information
    School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    Kongzhi yu Juece Control Decis, 2007, 5 (545-548+553):
  • [38] Deconstruction plan assessment using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Chen, Z
    Abdullah, A
    Anumba, C
    Li, H
    Xu, Q
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2: CHALLENGE OF INNOVATION IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, : 465 - 469
  • [39] Analysis of the performance of assessment scales with multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Demir, Alparslan Serhat
    Yazici, Esra
    Ogur, Yavuz Selim
    Yazici, Ahmet Bulent
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2023, 11 (03): : 192 - 197
  • [40] Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification
    Medineckiene, M.
    Zavadskas, E. K.
    Bjork, F.
    Turskis, Z.
    ARCHIVES OF CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 15 (01) : 11 - 18