A Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Process-Based Digitalisation Opportunity and Priority Assessment (DOPA)

被引:1
|
作者
Yildirim, Nihan [1 ]
Siyahi, Birden Tulug [2 ]
Ozbek, Oguz [2 ]
Ahioglu, Imran [1 ]
Kahya, Almira Selin [3 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Biligopex, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
关键词
AHP; Digital Transformation; Digitalisation Roadmap; FAHP; FMEA; Industry; 4.0; Priority Setting; Quality Management; Technology Selection; TOPSIS; Voice of Customer; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; FAILURE MODE; FUZZY; TOPSIS; AHP; SELECTION; SOFTWARE; FMEA;
D O I
10.4018/IJBAN.298018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the introduction of Industry 4.0 and supporting technologies, both service and manufacturing companies faced external and internal pressure for "going digital." In many cases, companies cannot decide on the digitalisation initiative due to preliminary groundwork to justify the required investment. For digitalisation priority setting under uncertain benefits, available digital technology selection methods lack the focus on process needs and do not fully utilise quality management tools in the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework. In this context, this study aims to propose a novel, context-independent, and process-based digital opportunity priority assessment (DOPA) methodology. The proposed approach utilizes critical to quality measures (CTQs), the causes with potential adversary effects as alternatives, and the importance, frequency, and digital control level of CTQs as the criteria in TOPSIS. AHP and Fuzzy AHP validate CTQ importance criteria. The study also presents a real industry application to validate the proposed model.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING BASED COURSE ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK: DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION
    Aburas, H. M.
    Batarfi, I. A.
    Bahshwan, A. F.
    Alzahrani, R. A.
    Qarout, A. M.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 33 (04) : 1 - 9
  • [2] Multi-criteria decision-making process for buildings
    Barcomb, JD
    Curtner, A
    35TH INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT (IECEC), VOLS 1 AND 2, TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2000, : 528 - 535
  • [3] A multi-criteria decision-making framework for building sustainability assessment in Kazakhstan
    Akhanova, Gulzhanat
    Nadeem, Abid
    Kim, Jong R.
    Azhar, Salman
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 52
  • [4] Energy Security Assessment Based on a New Dynamic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework
    Ziemba, Pawel
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (24)
  • [5] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [6] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis E.
    Delolme L.
    Antomarchi A.-L.
    Durieux S.
    Duc E.
    Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20
  • [7] Water Quality Assessment Based on Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method with Index Method
    Mladenovic-Ranisavljevic, Ivana I.
    Takic, Lj.
    Nikolic, D.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (07) : 2261 - 2276
  • [8] Water Quality Assessment Based on Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method with Index Method
    Ivana I. Mladenović-Ranisavljević
    Lj. Takić
    Đ. Nikolić
    Water Resources Management, 2018, 32 : 2261 - 2276
  • [9] A process-based model for priority convergence in multi-period group decision-making
    Bendoly, E
    Bachrach, DG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 148 (03) : 534 - 545
  • [10] Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Universities Ranking
    Aliyev, Rashad
    Temizkan, Hasan
    Aliyev, Rafig
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (08): : 1 - 15