The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units

被引:20
|
作者
Hauge, Ingrid H. R. [1 ,2 ]
Hogg, Peter [3 ]
Szczepura, Katy [3 ]
Connolly, Paul [4 ]
McGill, George [5 ]
Mercer, Claire [6 ]
机构
[1] Oslo & Akershus Univ Coll Appl Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiog & Dent Technol, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Radiat Protect Author, NO-1332 Osteras, Norway
[3] Univ Salford, Directorate Radiog, Salford M6 6PU, Lancs, England
[4] Integrated Radiol Serv Ltd, Liverpool L3 4BJ, Merseyside, England
[5] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[6] Royal Bolton Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Bolton BL4 0JR, England
关键词
mammography; breast thickness; breast compression; COMPRESSED BREAST THICKNESS; DENSITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1118/1.3663579
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To establish a simple method to determine breast readout accuracy on mammography units. Methods: A thickness measuring device (TMD) was used in conjunction with a breast phantom. This phantom had compression characteristics similar to human female breast tissue. The phantom was compressed, and the thickness was measured using TMD and mammography unit readout. Measurements were performed on a range of screen film mammography (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) units (8 units in total; 6 different models/manufacturers) for two different sized paddles and two different compression forces (60 and 100 N). Results: The difference between machine readout and TMD for the breast area, when applying 100 N compression force, for nonflexible paddles was largest for GE Senographe DMR+ (24 cm x 30 cm paddle: +14.3%). For flexible paddles the largest difference occurred for Hologic Lorad Selenia (18 cm x 24 cm paddle: +26.0%). Conclusions: None of the units assessed were found to have perfect correlation between measured and readout thickness. TMD measures and thickness readouts were different for the duplicate units from two different models/manufacturers. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3663579]
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 271
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of a new full-field digital mammography system and conventional film-screen mammography: A phantom study
    Bick, U
    Diekmann, F
    Marth, F
    Le Roux, A
    Juran, R
    Friedrich, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 152 - 152
  • [32] Contrast-detail-resolution of full-field digital mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography
    Bick, U
    Diekmann, F
    Grebe, S
    Marth, F
    Juran, R
    Friedrich, M
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 627 - 632
  • [33] Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography
    Diekmann, S
    Bick, U
    von Heyden, H
    Diekmann, F
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2003, 175 (06): : 775 - 779
  • [34] Improved detection of low contrast objects with full-field digital mammography compared to film-screen mammography
    Niklason, LT
    OpsahlOng, B
    Landberg, C
    Castleberry, DE
    Venkatakrishnan, V
    Kopans, DB
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1249 - 1249
  • [35] Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: Comparison in the patients with microcalcifications
    Kim, HS
    Han, BK
    Choo, KS
    Jeon, YH
    Kim, JH
    Choe, YH
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 6 (04) : 214 - 220
  • [36] Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography
    Diekmann, SD
    Von Heyden, H
    Bick, U
    Von Heyden, D
    Luftner-Nagel, S
    Hamm, BK
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 416 - 416
  • [37] Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: The Sogn and Fjordane study
    Juel, Inger-Marie
    Skaane, Per
    Hoff, Solveig Roth
    Johannessen, Gunnar
    Hofvind, Solveig
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (09) : 962 - 968
  • [38] Comparison of full-field digital mammography with CR mammography
    Uchiyama, N
    Kobayashi, H
    Tajima, H
    Machida, M
    Kumazaki, T
    Moriyama, N
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 119 - 119
  • [39] Performance of full-field digital mammography versus digital breast
    Wang, Mengru
    Zhuang, Shan
    Sheng, Liuli
    Zhao, Yu Nian
    Shen, Wenrong
    PRECISION MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 11 (02): : 56 - 61
  • [40] The Impact of the Transition to Full Field Digital Mammography from Film Screen Mammography
    Woldenberg, Nina
    Plecha, Donna
    Panneerselvam, Ashok
    Schluchter, Mark
    Pham, Ramya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 32 (05): : 554 - 555