The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units

被引:20
|
作者
Hauge, Ingrid H. R. [1 ,2 ]
Hogg, Peter [3 ]
Szczepura, Katy [3 ]
Connolly, Paul [4 ]
McGill, George [5 ]
Mercer, Claire [6 ]
机构
[1] Oslo & Akershus Univ Coll Appl Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiog & Dent Technol, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Radiat Protect Author, NO-1332 Osteras, Norway
[3] Univ Salford, Directorate Radiog, Salford M6 6PU, Lancs, England
[4] Integrated Radiol Serv Ltd, Liverpool L3 4BJ, Merseyside, England
[5] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[6] Royal Bolton Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Bolton BL4 0JR, England
关键词
mammography; breast thickness; breast compression; COMPRESSED BREAST THICKNESS; DENSITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1118/1.3663579
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To establish a simple method to determine breast readout accuracy on mammography units. Methods: A thickness measuring device (TMD) was used in conjunction with a breast phantom. This phantom had compression characteristics similar to human female breast tissue. The phantom was compressed, and the thickness was measured using TMD and mammography unit readout. Measurements were performed on a range of screen film mammography (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) units (8 units in total; 6 different models/manufacturers) for two different sized paddles and two different compression forces (60 and 100 N). Results: The difference between machine readout and TMD for the breast area, when applying 100 N compression force, for nonflexible paddles was largest for GE Senographe DMR+ (24 cm x 30 cm paddle: +14.3%). For flexible paddles the largest difference occurred for Hologic Lorad Selenia (18 cm x 24 cm paddle: +26.0%). Conclusions: None of the units assessed were found to have perfect correlation between measured and readout thickness. TMD measures and thickness readouts were different for the duplicate units from two different models/manufacturers. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3663579]
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 271
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography:: image quality and lesion detection
    Fischmann, A
    Siegmann, KC
    Wersebe, A
    Claussen, CD
    Müller-Schimpfle, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (928): : 312 - 315
  • [22] Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography in comparison with screen film mammography by hard copy images
    Uchiyama, N
    Tajima, H
    Machida, M
    Takahama, K
    Kumazaki, T
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 191 - 191
  • [23] Rate and causes of disagreement between full-field digital mammography and film screen mammography in a diagnostic setting
    Venta, LA
    Kay, NI
    Mengoni, PM
    Adler, YT
    Beam, CA
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 322 - 322
  • [24] Full-field digital mammography
    Bick, U
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (12): : 957 - 964
  • [25] Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications
    Hermann, KP
    Obenauer, S
    Funke, M
    Grabbe, EH
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) : 2188 - 2191
  • [26] Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications
    K.-P. Hermann
    S. Obenauer
    M. Funke
    E. Grabbe
    European Radiology, 2002, 12 : 2188 - 2191
  • [27] Full-field digital mammography
    U Bick
    Breast Cancer Research, 2 (Suppl 2)
  • [28] Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: Comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts
    Del Turco, Marco Rosselli
    Mantellini, Paola
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Bonardi, Rita
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Lazzari, Barbara
    Houssami, Nehmat
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (04) : 860 - 866
  • [29] Full-field digital mammography vs film-screen mammography in patients with microcalcifications: Comparison of detection and characterization
    Fischer, U
    Baum, FT
    Luftner-Nagel, S
    Obenauer, S
    Von Heyden, D
    Grabbe, EH
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 201 - 201
  • [30] Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting
    Venta, LA
    Hendrick, RE
    Adler, YT
    DeLeon, P
    Mengoni, PM
    Scharl, AM
    Comstock, CE
    Hansen, L
    Kay, N
    Coveler, A
    Cutter, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (05) : 1241 - 1248