Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study

被引:16
|
作者
Haugom, Espen W. [1 ,2 ]
Stensrud, Bjorn [1 ]
Beston, Gro [1 ]
Ruud, Torleif [3 ,4 ]
Landheim, Anne S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Concurrent Subst Abu, PB 104, N-2381 Brumunddal, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Ctr Addict Res SERAF, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[5] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Elverum, Norway
关键词
Shared decision making; psychotic disorders; mental health services; qualitative research; MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; RECOVERY; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTIONS; MEDICATION; ENCOUNTER; CAPACITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is a process where the patient and the health professional collaborate to make decisions based on both the patient's preferences and the best available evidence. Patients with psychotic disorders are less involved in making decisions than they would like. More knowledge of these patients' experiences of SDM may improve implementation. The study aim was to describe and explore experiences of SDM among patients with psychotic disorders in mental health care. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with ten persons with a psychotic disorder. They were service users of two community mental health centres. The transcribed material was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Four-fifths of the participants in this study found that they received insufficient information about their health situation and treatment options. All participants experienced that only one kind of treatment was often presented, which was usually medication. Although the study found that different degrees of involvement were practised, two thirds of the participants had little impact on choices to be made. This was despite the fact that they wanted to participate and felt capable of participating, even during periods of more severe illness. The participants described how important it was that SDM in psychosis was based on a trusting relationship, but stated that it took time to establish such a relationship. Conclusions This study with ten participants indicates that patients with psychotic disorders experienced that they were not allowed to participate as much as they wanted to and believed they were capable of. Some patients were involved, but to a lesser degree than in SDM. More and better tailored information communicated within a trusting relationship is needed to provide psychotic patients with a better basis for active involvement in decisions about their health care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patients' needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy
    van Hienen, Anniek R.
    Offermann, Claudia J. W.
    Boersma, Liesbeth J.
    Jacobs, Maria J. G.
    Fijten, Rianne R. R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S2933 - S2934
  • [42] Perceived shared decision-making among patients undergoing lower-limb amputation and their care teams: A qualitative study
    Leonard, Chelsea
    Sayre, George
    Williams, Sienna
    Henderson, Alison
    Norvell, Dan
    Turner, Aaron P.
    Czerniecki, Joseph
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 47 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [43] Experiences and Preferences in Supportive Care in Childhood Cancer and Shared Decision Making - A Focus Group Study among Dutch Patients and Parents
    Loeffen, E. A. H.
    Kremer, L. C. M.
    Tenniglo, L. J. A.
    Mulder, R. L.
    Font-Gonzalez, A.
    Postma, L.
    van de wetering, M. D.
    Grootenhuis, M. A.
    Tissing, W. J. E.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2016, 63 : S285 - S285
  • [44] Patient and Provider Decision-Making Experiences: A Qualitative Study
    Kinchen, Elizabeth
    Lange, Bernadette
    Newman, David
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 43 (08) : 713 - 722
  • [45] Vascular Access Selection Among People Receiving Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making
    Elliott, Meghan J.
    Ravani, Pietro
    Quinn, Robert R.
    MacRae, Jennifer M.
    Love, Shannan
    Oliver, Matthew J.
    Hiremath, Swapnil
    James, Matthew T.
    King-Shier, Kathryn M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 348 - 348
  • [46] Challenges to Shared Decision Making About Treatment of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study of Patients and Clinicians
    House, Taylor R.
    Wightman, Aaron
    Rosenberg, Abby R.
    Sayre, George
    Abdel-Kader, Khaled
    Wong, Susan P. Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2022, 79 (05) : 657 - +
  • [47] Patient Activation and Shared Decision-Making Among Hispanics/Latinos With Metastatic Cancer: A Qualitative Study
    Meguro, Julia
    Khawand-Azoulai, Mariana
    Medina, Heidy N.
    Pons, Magela
    Huber, Michael T.
    Penedo, Frank J.
    Moreno, Patricia I.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2025, 34 (04)
  • [48] The effects of treatment as usual versus a computerized clinical decision aid on shared decision-making in the treatment of psychotic disorders
    Roebroek, L. O.
    Bruins, J.
    Boonstra, A.
    Delespaul, P. A.
    Castelein, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 38 (01):
  • [49] Shared Decision-Making in Hemophilic Arthropathy Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study
    Liu, Yan-Qiu
    Guo, Yu-Lin
    Xu, Jia
    Geng, Wen-Jing
    Li, Zhen-Zhen
    Jia, Ming
    Liu, Yu-Dan
    Zhao, Hua
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2023, 17 : 249 - 257
  • [50] Practitioners' views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study
    Ankolekar, A.
    Steffensen, K. Dahl
    Olling, K.
    Dekker, A.
    Wee, L.
    Roumen, C.
    Hasannejadasl, H.
    Fijten, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S883 - S884