Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study

被引:16
|
作者
Haugom, Espen W. [1 ,2 ]
Stensrud, Bjorn [1 ]
Beston, Gro [1 ]
Ruud, Torleif [3 ,4 ]
Landheim, Anne S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Concurrent Subst Abu, PB 104, N-2381 Brumunddal, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Ctr Addict Res SERAF, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[5] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Elverum, Norway
关键词
Shared decision making; psychotic disorders; mental health services; qualitative research; MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; RECOVERY; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTIONS; MEDICATION; ENCOUNTER; CAPACITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is a process where the patient and the health professional collaborate to make decisions based on both the patient's preferences and the best available evidence. Patients with psychotic disorders are less involved in making decisions than they would like. More knowledge of these patients' experiences of SDM may improve implementation. The study aim was to describe and explore experiences of SDM among patients with psychotic disorders in mental health care. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with ten persons with a psychotic disorder. They were service users of two community mental health centres. The transcribed material was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Four-fifths of the participants in this study found that they received insufficient information about their health situation and treatment options. All participants experienced that only one kind of treatment was often presented, which was usually medication. Although the study found that different degrees of involvement were practised, two thirds of the participants had little impact on choices to be made. This was despite the fact that they wanted to participate and felt capable of participating, even during periods of more severe illness. The participants described how important it was that SDM in psychosis was based on a trusting relationship, but stated that it took time to establish such a relationship. Conclusions This study with ten participants indicates that patients with psychotic disorders experienced that they were not allowed to participate as much as they wanted to and believed they were capable of. Some patients were involved, but to a lesser degree than in SDM. More and better tailored information communicated within a trusting relationship is needed to provide psychotic patients with a better basis for active involvement in decisions about their health care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening
    Melzer, Anne C.
    Golden, Sara E.
    Ono, Sarah S.
    Datta, Santanu
    Crothers, Kristina
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (02) : 546 - 553
  • [32] Shared Decision-Making in Patients with Disorders of Sex Development
    Van Leeuwen, K.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH, 2019, 111 (09): : 463 - 463
  • [33] Patient Decision Aid Selection for Shared Decision Making: A Multicase Qualitative Study
    LeRouge, Cynthia
    Nguyen, Ann M.
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2022, 79 (02) : 267 - 280
  • [34] Decision-making capacity in older patients with psychotic disorders.
    Palmer, BW
    Dunn, LB
    Heaton, RK
    Nayak, G
    Jeste, DV
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 10 (02): : 36 - 36
  • [35] Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences
    Muir, Nancy B.
    Orlin, Margo
    Rubertone, Patricia
    Williams, Glenn
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2025, 483 (01) : 120 - 136
  • [36] Exploring the Experiences of Client Involvement in Medication Decisions Using a Shared Decision Making Model: Results of a Qualitative Study
    Goscha, Richard
    Rapp, Charles
    COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2015, 51 (03) : 267 - 274
  • [37] Exploring the Experiences of Client Involvement in Medication Decisions Using a Shared Decision Making Model: Results of a Qualitative Study
    Richard Goscha
    Charles Rapp
    Community Mental Health Journal, 2015, 51 : 267 - 274
  • [38] THE EXPERIENCES AND PREFERENCES OF SHARED DECISION MAKING AND THEIR ASSOCIATED FACTORS AMONG CANCER PATIENTS UNDERGOING RADIATION THERAPY
    Uchida, Megumi
    Sugie, Chikao
    Yoshimura, Michio
    Suzuki, Eiji
    Shibamoto, Yuta
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    Toi, Masakazu
    Akechi, Tatsuo
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2015, 11 : 145 - 145
  • [39] Shared decision making and nursing informatics research in Norway
    Ruland, CM
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2005, 18 (02) : 70 - 72
  • [40] Clinician Experiences in Treatment Decision-Making for Patients with Spinal Metastases A Qualitative Study
    Barton, Lauren B.
    Arant, Kaetlyn R.
    Blucher, Justin A.
    Sarno, Danielle L.
    Redmond, Kristin J.
    Balboni, Tracy A.
    Colman, Matthew
    Goodwin, C. Rory
    Laufer, Ilya
    Placide, Rick
    Shin, John H.
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    Losina, Elena
    Katz, Jeffrey N.
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (01): : E1