FUNDAMENTAL REDUNDANCY VERSUS POWER TRADE-OFF IN STANDBY SRAM

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, A. [1 ]
Qin, H. [1 ]
Ishwar, P. [2 ]
Rabaey, J. [1 ]
Ramchandran, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, EECS, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Boston Univ, ECE, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
memory architecture; SRAM chips; error correction coding; information theory; circuit optimization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
We study the problem of reducing power during data-retention in a standby static random access memory (SRAM). For successful data-retention, the supply voltage of an SRAM cell should be greater than a critical data retention voltage (DRV). Due to circuit parameter variations, the DRV for different cells on the same chip exhibits variation with a distribution having diminishing tail. For reliable data retention, the existing low-power design uses a worst-case technique in which a standby supply voltage that is larger than the highest DRV among all cells in an SRAM is used. Instead, our approach uses aggressive voltage reduction and counters the ensuing unreliability through a fault-tolerant memory architecture. The main results of this work are as follows: (i) We establish fundamental bounds on the power reduction in terms of the DRV-distribution using techniques from information theory. For the DRV-distribution of test-chip in [1], we show that 49% power reduction with respect to (w.r.t.) the worst-case is a fundamental lower bound while 40% power reduction w.r.t. the worst-case is achievable with a practical combinatorial scheme. (ii) We study the power reduction as a function of the block-length for low-latency codes since most applications using SRAM are latency constrained. We propose a reliable memory architecture based on the Hamming code for the next test-chip implementation with a predicted power reduction of 33% while accounting for coding overheads.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A disinflation trade-off: Speed versus final destination
    Carlson, JA
    Valev, NT
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2002, 40 (03) : 450 - 456
  • [42] Affordability versus quality, effectiveness and equity: Is there a trade-off?
    Nolan, B
    HEALTH CARE REFORM: THE WILL TO CHANGE, 1996, (08): : 81 - 94
  • [43] INFLATION VERSUS UNEMPLOYMENT - ANOTHER VIEW OF TRADE-OFF
    WALLACK, SS
    MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1971, 94 (11) : 49 - 54
  • [44] Public versus private provision of liquidity: Is there a trade-off?
    Roehrs, Sigrid
    Winter, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2015, 53 : 314 - 339
  • [45] Inflation versus unemployment in South Africa: Is there a trade-off
    Hodge, D
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 70 (03) : 417 - 443
  • [46] Free trade trade-off
    Freedman, M
    FORBES, 2002, 169 (06): : 44 - 44
  • [47] The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic
    Dolan, P
    Stalmeier, P
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 22 (03) : 445 - 458
  • [48] Fundamental Limits of Budget-Fidelity Trade-off in Label Crowdsourcing
    Lahouti, Farshad
    Hassibi, Babak
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 29 (NIPS 2016), 2016, 29
  • [49] A fundamental trade-off in resource exploitation by Daphnia and consequences to plankton communities
    Tessier, AJ
    Leibold, MA
    Tsao, J
    ECOLOGY, 2000, 81 (03) : 826 - 841
  • [50] Green Hybrid Satellite Terrestrial Networks: Fundamental Trade-off Analysis
    Zhang, Jiaxin
    Evans, Barry
    Imran, Muhammad Ali
    Zhang, Xing
    Wang, Wenbo
    2016 IEEE 83RD VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC SPRING), 2016,