FUNDAMENTAL REDUNDANCY VERSUS POWER TRADE-OFF IN STANDBY SRAM

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, A. [1 ]
Qin, H. [1 ]
Ishwar, P. [2 ]
Rabaey, J. [1 ]
Ramchandran, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, EECS, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Boston Univ, ECE, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
memory architecture; SRAM chips; error correction coding; information theory; circuit optimization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
We study the problem of reducing power during data-retention in a standby static random access memory (SRAM). For successful data-retention, the supply voltage of an SRAM cell should be greater than a critical data retention voltage (DRV). Due to circuit parameter variations, the DRV for different cells on the same chip exhibits variation with a distribution having diminishing tail. For reliable data retention, the existing low-power design uses a worst-case technique in which a standby supply voltage that is larger than the highest DRV among all cells in an SRAM is used. Instead, our approach uses aggressive voltage reduction and counters the ensuing unreliability through a fault-tolerant memory architecture. The main results of this work are as follows: (i) We establish fundamental bounds on the power reduction in terms of the DRV-distribution using techniques from information theory. For the DRV-distribution of test-chip in [1], we show that 49% power reduction with respect to (w.r.t.) the worst-case is a fundamental lower bound while 40% power reduction w.r.t. the worst-case is achievable with a practical combinatorial scheme. (ii) We study the power reduction as a function of the block-length for low-latency codes since most applications using SRAM are latency constrained. We propose a reliable memory architecture based on the Hamming code for the next test-chip implementation with a predicted power reduction of 33% while accounting for coding overheads.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Carrier Aggregation for Improved Rate versus Power trade-off in Massive MIMO Systems
    Zappone, Alessio
    Perez, David Lopez
    De Domenico, Antonio
    Piovesan, Nicola
    Bao, Harvey
    2022 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM 2022), 2022, : 1655 - 1660
  • [32] Read Access Optimization for Enhancement of SRAM Yield-Reliability Trade-off
    Skurikhin, Danil
    Korshunov, Andrey
    2017 IEEE EAST-WEST DESIGN & TEST SYMPOSIUM (EWDTS), 2017,
  • [33] Uncertainty trade-off and disturbance trade-off for quantum measurements
    Srinivas, M. D.
    Mandayam, Prabha
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2015, 109 (11): : 2044 - 2051
  • [34] Face Time Versus Test Ordering: Is There a Trade-off?
    Stahl, James E.
    Drew, Mark A.
    Weilburg, Jeffrey
    Sistrom, Chris
    Kimball, Alexa B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2013, 19 : SP362 - SP368
  • [35] Accuracy versus Incentives A Trade-Off for Performance Measurement
    Schwartz, Aaron L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 7 (03) : 333 - 360
  • [36] Output stabilization versus deficit sustainability: Is it a trade-off
    Candelon, B
    Henin, PY
    BUSINESS CYCLES AND MACROECONOMIC STABILITY: SHOULD WE REBUILD BUILT-IN STABILIZERS?, 1997, : 281 - 300
  • [37] Expected versus experienced quality: trade-off with price
    Lange, C
    Issanchou, S
    Combris, P
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2000, 11 (04) : 289 - 297
  • [38] Social protection versus economic flexibility: Is there a trade-off?
    Rogowski, R
    WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 1997, 11 (01) : 153 - 165
  • [39] Regeneration versus budding in fungiid corals: A trade-off
    KramarskyWinter, E
    Loya, Y
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1996, 134 (1-3) : 179 - 185
  • [40] The gamut versus brightness trade-off in reflective displays
    Bert, T.
    IDW '07: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL DISPLAY WORKSHOPS, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 299 - 302