Prehospital triage of acute aortic syndrome using a machine learning algorithm

被引:13
|
作者
Duceau, B. [1 ,2 ]
Alsac, J-M [3 ]
Bellenfant, F. [1 ,2 ]
Mailloux, A. [1 ,2 ]
Champigneulle, B. [1 ,2 ]
Fave, G. [1 ,2 ]
Neuschwander, A. [1 ,2 ]
El Batti, S. [3 ]
Cholley, B. [1 ,2 ]
Achouh, P. [3 ]
Pirracchio, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, AP HP, Dept Anaesthesiol, Paris, France
[2] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, AP HP, Dept Intens Care, Paris, France
[3] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, AP HP, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Paris, France
关键词
ROC CURVE; DISSECTION; OUTCOMES; VOLUME; IMPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; MORTALITY; DIAGNOSIS; TRANSPORT; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.11442
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) comprises a complex and potentially fatal group of conditions requiring emergency specialist management. The aim of this study was to build a prediction algorithm to assist prehospital triage of AAS. Methods Details of consecutive patients enrolled in a regional specialist aortic network were collected prospectively. Two prediction algorithms for AAS based on logistic regression and an ensemble machine learning method called SuperLearner (SL) were developed. Undertriage was defined as the proportion of patients with AAS not transported to the specialist aortic centre, and overtriage as the proportion of patients with alternative diagnoses but transported to the specialist aortic centre. Results Data for 976 hospital admissions between February 2010 and June 2017 were included; 609 (62 center dot 4 per cent) had AAS. Overtriage and undertriage rates were 52 center dot 3 and 16 center dot 1 per cent respectively. The population was divided into a training cohort (743 patients) and a validation cohort (233). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values for the logistic regression score and the SL were 0 center dot 68 (95 per cent c.i. 0 center dot 64 to 0 center dot 72) and 0 center dot 87 (0 center dot 84 to 0 center dot 89) respectively (P < 0 center dot 001) in the training cohort, and 0 center dot 67 (0 center dot 60 to 0 center dot 74) and 0 center dot 73 (0 center dot 66 to 0 center dot 79) in the validation cohort (P = 0 center dot 038). The logistic regression score was associated with undertriage and overtriage rates of 33 center dot 7 (bootstrapped 95 per cent c.i. 29 center dot 3 to 38 center dot 3) and 7 center dot 2 (4 center dot 8 to 9 center dot 8) per cent respectively, whereas the SL yielded undertriage and overtriage rates of 1 center dot 0 (0 center dot 3 to 2 center dot 0) and 30 center dot 2 (25 center dot 8 to 34 center dot 8) per cent respectively. Conclusion A machine learning prediction model performed well in discriminating AAS and could be clinically useful in prehospital triage of patients with suspected AAS.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1003
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Added value of new acute coronary syndrome computer algorithm for interpretation of prehospital electrocardiograms
    Xue, J
    Aufderheide, T
    Wright, RS
    Klein, J
    Farrell, R
    Rowlandson, I
    Young, B
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2004, 37 : 233 - +
  • [42] Validation of the prehospital mSTaRT triage algorithm A pilot study for the development of a multicenter evaluation
    Paul, A. O.
    Kay, M. V.
    Huppertz, T.
    Mair, F.
    Dierking, Y.
    Hornburger, P.
    Mutschler, W.
    Kanz, K. -G.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2009, 112 (01): : 23 - +
  • [43] Development And Accuracy Of A Machine Learning Algorithm To Predict Stroke Mimic Conditions During Prehospital Assessment
    Lumley, H.
    Shaw, L.
    Lendrem, C.
    McClelland, G.
    McMeekin, P.
    Price, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2024, 19 (3_SUPPL) : 3 - 3
  • [44] Automated Detection of Aortic Stenosis Using Machine Learning
    Wessler, Benjamin S.
    Huang, Zhe
    Long, Gary M.
    Pacifici, Stefano
    Prashar, Nishant
    Karmiy, Samuel
    Sandler, Roman A.
    Sokol, Joseph Z.
    Sokol, Daniel B.
    Dehn, Monica M.
    Maslon, Luisa
    Mai, Eileen
    Patel, Ayan R.
    Hughes, Michael C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2023, 36 (04) : 411 - 420
  • [45] Defining the immune microenvironment in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia using machine learning
    Albitar, Maher
    Zhang, Hong
    Koprivnikar, Jamie
    McCloskey, James K.
    Linder, Kathrine
    Ip, Andrew
    Estella, Jeffrey
    Charifa, Ahmad
    Ma, Wanlong
    Mohtashamian, Arash
    Pecora, Andrew L.
    Goy, Andre
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
  • [46] Using machine learning to predict adverse events in acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective study
    Song, Long
    Li, Yuan
    Nie, Shanshan
    Feng, Zeying
    Liu, Yaxin
    Ding, Fangfang
    Gong, Liying
    Liu, Liming
    Yang, Guoping
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (12) : 1594 - 1602
  • [47] A Comprehensive Analysis on Risk Prediction of Acute Coronary Syndrome using Machine Learning Approaches
    Raihan, M.
    Islam, Muhammad Muinul
    Ghosh, Promila
    Shaj, Shakil Ahmed
    Chowdhury, Mubtasim Rafid
    Mondal, Saikat
    More, Arun
    2018 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ICCIT), 2018,
  • [48] Prediction of emergency department presentations for acute coronary syndrome using a machine learning approach
    Kurucz, Vincent C.
    Schenk, Jimmy
    Veelo, Denise P.
    Geerts, Bart F.
    Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
    van der Ster, Bjoern J. P.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [49] Development of Bottle Recycling Machine using Machine Learning Algorithm
    Dhulekar, Pravin
    Gandhe, S. T.
    Mahajan, Ulhas P.
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY (ICACCT), 2018, : 515 - 519
  • [50] Enhancing utility of interfacility triage guidelines using machine learning: Development of the Geriatric Interfacility Trauma Triage score
    Garwe, Tabitha
    Newgard, Craig D.
    Stewart, Kenneth
    Wan, Yang
    Cody, Patrick
    Cutler, James
    Acharya, Pawan
    Albrecht, Roxie M.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2023, 94 (04): : 546 - 553