Prehospital triage of acute aortic syndrome using a machine learning algorithm

被引:13
|
作者
Duceau, B. [1 ,2 ]
Alsac, J-M [3 ]
Bellenfant, F. [1 ,2 ]
Mailloux, A. [1 ,2 ]
Champigneulle, B. [1 ,2 ]
Fave, G. [1 ,2 ]
Neuschwander, A. [1 ,2 ]
El Batti, S. [3 ]
Cholley, B. [1 ,2 ]
Achouh, P. [3 ]
Pirracchio, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, AP HP, Dept Anaesthesiol, Paris, France
[2] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, AP HP, Dept Intens Care, Paris, France
[3] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, AP HP, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Paris, France
关键词
ROC CURVE; DISSECTION; OUTCOMES; VOLUME; IMPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; MORTALITY; DIAGNOSIS; TRANSPORT; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.11442
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) comprises a complex and potentially fatal group of conditions requiring emergency specialist management. The aim of this study was to build a prediction algorithm to assist prehospital triage of AAS. Methods Details of consecutive patients enrolled in a regional specialist aortic network were collected prospectively. Two prediction algorithms for AAS based on logistic regression and an ensemble machine learning method called SuperLearner (SL) were developed. Undertriage was defined as the proportion of patients with AAS not transported to the specialist aortic centre, and overtriage as the proportion of patients with alternative diagnoses but transported to the specialist aortic centre. Results Data for 976 hospital admissions between February 2010 and June 2017 were included; 609 (62 center dot 4 per cent) had AAS. Overtriage and undertriage rates were 52 center dot 3 and 16 center dot 1 per cent respectively. The population was divided into a training cohort (743 patients) and a validation cohort (233). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values for the logistic regression score and the SL were 0 center dot 68 (95 per cent c.i. 0 center dot 64 to 0 center dot 72) and 0 center dot 87 (0 center dot 84 to 0 center dot 89) respectively (P < 0 center dot 001) in the training cohort, and 0 center dot 67 (0 center dot 60 to 0 center dot 74) and 0 center dot 73 (0 center dot 66 to 0 center dot 79) in the validation cohort (P = 0 center dot 038). The logistic regression score was associated with undertriage and overtriage rates of 33 center dot 7 (bootstrapped 95 per cent c.i. 29 center dot 3 to 38 center dot 3) and 7 center dot 2 (4 center dot 8 to 9 center dot 8) per cent respectively, whereas the SL yielded undertriage and overtriage rates of 1 center dot 0 (0 center dot 3 to 2 center dot 0) and 30 center dot 2 (25 center dot 8 to 34 center dot 8) per cent respectively. Conclusion A machine learning prediction model performed well in discriminating AAS and could be clinically useful in prehospital triage of patients with suspected AAS.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1003
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prehospital triage of patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: Rationale and design of the TRIAGE-ACS study
    Demandt, Jesse P. A.
    Koks, Arjan
    Haest, Rutger
    Heijmen, Eric
    Thijssen, Eric
    Otterspoor, Luuk C.
    van Veghel, Dennis
    El Farissi, Mohamed
    Eerdekens, Rob
    Vervaat, Fabienne
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Veer, Marcel V. T.
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    Dekker, Lukas R. C.
    Vlaar, Pieter J.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 119
  • [32] Machine Learning for Biomedical Literature Triage
    Almeida, Hayda
    Meurs, Marie-Jean
    Kosseim, Leila
    Butler, Greg
    Tsang, Adrian
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [33] Improving the Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Machine Learning of Blood Biomarkers
    Rjoob, Khaled
    McGilligan, Victoria
    Bond, Raymond
    Watterson, Steven
    Chemaly, Melody
    McAlister, Roisin
    Malaquias, Tiago De Melo
    Leslie, Stephen J.
    Knoery, Charles
    Iftikhar, Aleeha
    McShane, Anne
    Bjourson, Anthony
    Peace, Aaron
    2020 COMPUTING IN CARDIOLOGY, 2020,
  • [34] End to end stroke triage using cerebrovascular morphology and machine learning
    Deshpande, Aditi
    Elliott, Jordan
    Jiang, Bin
    Tahsili-Fahadan, Pouya
    Kidwell, Chelsea
    Wintermark, Max
    Laksari, Kaveh
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [35] Predicting hospital admission at emergency department triage using machine learning
    Hong, Woo Suk
    Haimovich, Adrian Daniel
    Taylor, R. Andrew
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [36] Predicting Progression from Acute Liver Injury to Acute Liver Failure Using a Machine Learning Algorithm
    Speiser, Jaime L.
    Koch, David G.
    Lee, William M.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 60 : 546A - 546A
  • [37] Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke
    Yang, Li
    Liu, Qinqin
    Zhao, Qiuli
    Zhu, Xuemei
    Wang, Ling
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [38] Biosensor-Assisted Method for Abdominal Syndrome Classification Using Machine Learning Algorithm
    Gandhi, Charu
    Ahmad, Sayed Sayeed
    Mehbodniya, Abolfazl
    Webber, Julian L.
    Hemalatha, S.
    Elwahsh, Haitham
    Tiwari, Basant
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [39] Acute coronary syndrome in the prehospital phase
    Schiff, JH
    Arntz, HR
    Böttiger, BW
    ANAESTHESIST, 2005, 54 (10): : 957 - 974
  • [40] Predicting Hepatitis B to be acute or chronic in an infected person using machine learning algorithm
    Vijayalakshmi, C.
    Mohideen, S. Pakkir
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2022, 172