Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Significantly Reduces Death and Stroke Compared With Unprotected Procedures

被引:129
|
作者
Seeger, Julia [1 ]
Gonska, Birgid [1 ]
Otto, Markus [2 ]
Rottbauer, Wolfgang [1 ]
Woehrle, Jochen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Internal Med 2, Cardiol, Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Dept Neurol, Ulm, Germany
关键词
cerebral embolic protection; outcome; stroke; TAVR; INTERMEDIATE-RISK PATIENTS; SILENT BRAIN INFARCTS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; DEFLECTION DEVICE; IMPLANTATION; TRIAL; STENOSIS; METAANALYSIS; TAVI; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cerebral embolic protection on stroke-free survival in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND Imaging data on cerebral embolic protection devices have demonstrated a significant reduction in number and volume of cerebral lesions. METHODS A total of 802 consecutive patients were enrolled. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (Claret Medical Inc., Santa Rosa, California) was used in 34.9% (n = 280) of consecutive patients. In 65.1% (n = 522) of patients TAVR was performed in the identical setting except without cerebral embolic protection. Neurological follow-up was done within 7 days post-procedure. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or all-stroke according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria within 7 days. Propensity score matching was performed to account for possible confounders. RESULTS Both filters of the device were successfully positioned in 280 of 305 (91.8%) consecutive patients. With use of cerebral embolic protection rate of disabling and nondisabling stroke was significantly reduced from 4.6% to 1.4% (p = 0.03; odds ratio: 0.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.10 to 0.93) in the propensity-matched population (n = 560). The primary endpoint occurred significantly less frequently, with 2.1% (n = 6 of 280) in the protected group compared with 6.8% (n = 19 of 280) in the control group (p = 0.01; odds ratio: 0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.12 to 0.77). In multivariable analysis Society of Thoracic Surgeons score for mortality (p = 0.02) and TAVR without protection (p = 0.02) were independent predictors for the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing TAVR use of a cerebral embolic protection device demonstrated a significant higher rate of stroke-free survival compared with unprotected TAVR. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:2297 / 2303
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices: Are There Any Indications in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement?
    Sayah, Neila
    Skalidis, Ioannis
    Mesnier, Jules
    Neylon, Antoinette
    Akodad, Mariama
    Asgar, Anita
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (18)
  • [32] Effectiveness of Cerebral Embolic Protection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with High Aortic Valve Calcium Burden
    Gupta, A.
    Koren, O.
    Patel, V.
    Nagasaki, T.
    Patel, D.
    Golwala, K.
    Chakravarty, T.
    Al-Jilaihawi, H.
    Nakamura, M.
    Makkar, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44
  • [33] Outcomes of Cerebral Embolic Protection for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Zhang, Jiajun
    Li, Xiaoxing
    Tian, Rui
    Zong, Mengzhi
    Gu, Xinghua
    Xu, Feng
    Chen, Yuguo
    Li, Chuanbao
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (12):
  • [34] Embolic protection devices for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Gallo, Michele
    Putzu, Alessandro
    Conti, Michele
    Pedrazzini, Giovanni
    Demertzis, Stefanos
    Ferrari, Enrico
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (06) : 1118 - 1126
  • [35] Effectiveness of Cerebral Embolic Protection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With High Aortic Valve Calcium Burden
    Koren, Ofir
    Gupta, Aakriti
    Patel, Vivek
    Nagasaka, Takashi
    Patel, Dhairya
    Chakravarty, Tarun
    Jilaihawi, Hasan
    Makkar, Raj
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (17) : B82 - B82
  • [36] Embolic Protection Devices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Steinvil, Arie
    Benson, Richard T.
    Waksman, Ron
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (03)
  • [37] Feasibility of Sentinel Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Deployment During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Isogai, Toshiaki
    Vanguru, Husitha Reddy
    Krishnaswamy, Amar
    Agrawal, Ankit
    Spilias, Nikolaos
    Shekhar, Shashank
    Saad, Anas M.
    Verma, Beni Rai
    Puri, Rishi
    Reed, Grant W.
    Popovic, Zoran B.
    Unai, Shinya
    Yun, James J.
    Uchino, Ken
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 184 : 157 - 159
  • [38] The TriGuard embolic deflection device for prevention of stroke and cerebral embolization during transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Baumbach, Andreas
    Pietras, Cody
    Lansky, Alexandra
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (06) : 649 - 651
  • [39] Early Outcomes With Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Shekhar, Shashank
    Krishnaswamy, Amar
    Reed, Grant
    Yun, James
    Puri, Rishi
    Kapadia, Samir
    STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM, 2025, 9 (01):
  • [40] Cerebral Embolic Protection and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Results From the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry
    Butala, Neel M.
    Makkar, Raj
    Secemsky, Eric A.
    Gallup, Dianne
    Marquis-Gravel, Guillaume
    Kosinski, Andrzej S.
    Vemulapalli, Sreekanth
    Valle, Javier A.
    Bradley, Steven M.
    Chakravarty, Tarun
    Yeh, Robert W.
    Cohen, David J.
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 143 (23) : 2229 - 2240