Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Significantly Reduces Death and Stroke Compared With Unprotected Procedures

被引:129
|
作者
Seeger, Julia [1 ]
Gonska, Birgid [1 ]
Otto, Markus [2 ]
Rottbauer, Wolfgang [1 ]
Woehrle, Jochen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Internal Med 2, Cardiol, Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Dept Neurol, Ulm, Germany
关键词
cerebral embolic protection; outcome; stroke; TAVR; INTERMEDIATE-RISK PATIENTS; SILENT BRAIN INFARCTS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; DEFLECTION DEVICE; IMPLANTATION; TRIAL; STENOSIS; METAANALYSIS; TAVI; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cerebral embolic protection on stroke-free survival in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND Imaging data on cerebral embolic protection devices have demonstrated a significant reduction in number and volume of cerebral lesions. METHODS A total of 802 consecutive patients were enrolled. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (Claret Medical Inc., Santa Rosa, California) was used in 34.9% (n = 280) of consecutive patients. In 65.1% (n = 522) of patients TAVR was performed in the identical setting except without cerebral embolic protection. Neurological follow-up was done within 7 days post-procedure. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or all-stroke according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria within 7 days. Propensity score matching was performed to account for possible confounders. RESULTS Both filters of the device were successfully positioned in 280 of 305 (91.8%) consecutive patients. With use of cerebral embolic protection rate of disabling and nondisabling stroke was significantly reduced from 4.6% to 1.4% (p = 0.03; odds ratio: 0.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.10 to 0.93) in the propensity-matched population (n = 560). The primary endpoint occurred significantly less frequently, with 2.1% (n = 6 of 280) in the protected group compared with 6.8% (n = 19 of 280) in the control group (p = 0.01; odds ratio: 0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.12 to 0.77). In multivariable analysis Society of Thoracic Surgeons score for mortality (p = 0.02) and TAVR without protection (p = 0.02) were independent predictors for the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing TAVR use of a cerebral embolic protection device demonstrated a significant higher rate of stroke-free survival compared with unprotected TAVR. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:2297 / 2303
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Editorial commentary: Use of cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Panchal, Hemang B.
    Paul, Timir K.
    TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2018, 28 (06) : 419 - 420
  • [22] Cerebral embolic protection with filters and an occlusion balloon catheter during transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Noguchi, Yu
    Taniguchi, Tomohiko
    Koyanagi, Masaomi
    Furukawa, Yutaka
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2024, 8 (02)
  • [23] Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement A Disconnect Between Logic and Data?
    Latib, Azeem
    Pagnesi, Matteo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (04) : 378 - 380
  • [24] TriGuard™ HDH Embolic Deflection Device for Cerebral Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Samim, Mariam
    van der Worp, Bart
    Agostoni, Pierfrancesco
    Hendrikse, Jeroen
    Budde, Ricardo P. J.
    Nijhoff, Freek
    Ramjankhan, Faiz
    Doevendans, Pieter A.
    Stella, Pieter R.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 89 (03) : 470 - 477
  • [25] y Meta-Analysis of Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Al-Abdouh, Ahmad
    Mhanna, Mohammed
    Jabri, Ahmad
    Ahmed, Taha
    Altibi, Ahmed M.
    Ghanem, Fares
    Alhuneafat, Laith
    Albadawi, Ayman
    Barbarawi, Mahmoud
    Dewaswala, Nakeya
    Bhopalwala, Huzefa
    Kundu, Amartya
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 192 : 255 - 257
  • [26] Early Experience With Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    Alqahtani, Fahad
    Harris, Alyssa Hartsell
    Hohmann, Samuel F.
    Rihal, Charanjit S.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 180 (05) : 783 - 784
  • [27] Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Effective in Stroke Prevention? Reply
    Paulin, Laura M.
    Kaufman, Joel D.
    Hansel, Nadia N.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 180 (05) : 804 - 804
  • [28] Routine Use of Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (22) : 2304 - 2306
  • [29] 2024 Update on Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Gasior, Tomasz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (23)
  • [30] Cerebral Embolic Protection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Connecting Intuition and Proof
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    Krishnaswamy, Amar
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (02) : 169 - 171