Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Significantly Reduces Death and Stroke Compared With Unprotected Procedures

被引:129
|
作者
Seeger, Julia [1 ]
Gonska, Birgid [1 ]
Otto, Markus [2 ]
Rottbauer, Wolfgang [1 ]
Woehrle, Jochen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Internal Med 2, Cardiol, Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Dept Neurol, Ulm, Germany
关键词
cerebral embolic protection; outcome; stroke; TAVR; INTERMEDIATE-RISK PATIENTS; SILENT BRAIN INFARCTS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; DEFLECTION DEVICE; IMPLANTATION; TRIAL; STENOSIS; METAANALYSIS; TAVI; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cerebral embolic protection on stroke-free survival in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND Imaging data on cerebral embolic protection devices have demonstrated a significant reduction in number and volume of cerebral lesions. METHODS A total of 802 consecutive patients were enrolled. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (Claret Medical Inc., Santa Rosa, California) was used in 34.9% (n = 280) of consecutive patients. In 65.1% (n = 522) of patients TAVR was performed in the identical setting except without cerebral embolic protection. Neurological follow-up was done within 7 days post-procedure. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or all-stroke according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria within 7 days. Propensity score matching was performed to account for possible confounders. RESULTS Both filters of the device were successfully positioned in 280 of 305 (91.8%) consecutive patients. With use of cerebral embolic protection rate of disabling and nondisabling stroke was significantly reduced from 4.6% to 1.4% (p = 0.03; odds ratio: 0.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.10 to 0.93) in the propensity-matched population (n = 560). The primary endpoint occurred significantly less frequently, with 2.1% (n = 6 of 280) in the protected group compared with 6.8% (n = 19 of 280) in the control group (p = 0.01; odds ratio: 0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.12 to 0.77). In multivariable analysis Society of Thoracic Surgeons score for mortality (p = 0.02) and TAVR without protection (p = 0.02) were independent predictors for the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing TAVR use of a cerebral embolic protection device demonstrated a significant higher rate of stroke-free survival compared with unprotected TAVR. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:2297 / 2303
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cerebral embolic protection during transfemoral aortic valve replacement reduces death and stroke compared to unprotected procedure in all subgroups
    Seeger, Julia
    Gonska, Birgid
    Otto, Markus
    Rottbauer, Wolfgang
    Woehrle, Jochen
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (18) : B15 - B15
  • [2] Cerebral embolic protection for stroke prevention during transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Basit, Jawad
    Ahmed, Mushood
    Kidess, George
    Zaheer, Zaofashan
    Fatima, Laveeza
    Naveed, Hamza
    Hamza, Mohammad
    Fatima, Maurish
    Goyal, Aman
    Loyalka, Pranav
    Alam, Mahboob
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2024, 22 (08) : 409 - 420
  • [3] Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Yashima, Fumiaki
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Noguchi, Masahiko
    Ahmad, Hasan
    Zaid, Syed
    Goldberg, Joshua B.
    Malik, Aaqib H.
    Tang, Gilbert H. L.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2022, 36 : 9 - 13
  • [4] Cerebral Embolic Protection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Iskander, Mina
    Jamil, Yasser
    Forrest, John K.
    Madhavan, Mahesh V.
    Makkar, Raj
    Leon, Martin B.
    Lansky, Alexandra
    Ahmad, Yousif
    STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM, 2023, 7 (04):
  • [5] Cerebral Embolic Protection during Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement
    Kapadia, Samir R. R.
    Makkar, Raj
    Leon, Martin
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Waggoner, Thomas
    Massberg, Steffen
    Rottbauer, Wolfgang
    Horr, Samuel
    Sondergaard, Lars
    Karha, Juhana
    Gooley, Robert
    Satler, Lowell
    Stoler, Robert C.
    Messe, Steven R.
    Baron, Suzanne J.
    Seeger, Julia
    Kodali, Susheel
    Krishnaswamy, Amar
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Harrington, Katherine
    Pocock, Stuart
    Modolo, Rodrigo
    Allocco, Dominic J.
    Meredith, Ian T.
    Linke, Axel
    PROTECTED TAVR Investigators
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 387 (14): : 1253 - 1263
  • [6] Cerebral embolic protection and severity of stroke following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Isogai, Toshiaki
    Vanguru, Husitha Reddy
    Krishnaswamy, Amar
    Agrawal, Ankit
    Spilias, Nikolaos
    Shekhar, Shashank
    Saad, Anas M.
    Verma, Beni Rai
    Puri, Rishi
    Reed, Grant W.
    Popovic, Zoran B.
    Unai, Shinya
    Yun, James J.
    Uchino, Ken
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 100 (05) : 810 - 820
  • [7] Protection from Cerebral Embolic Events During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Rossow, Charles F.
    McCabe, James M.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 18 (02) : 1 - 7
  • [8] Protection from Cerebral Embolic Events During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Charles F. Rossow
    James M. McCabe
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2016, 18
  • [9] The Role of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Demir, Ozan M.
    Iannopollo, Gianmarco
    Mangieri, Antonio
    Ancona, Marco B.
    Regazzoli, Damiano
    Mitomo, Satoru
    Colombo, Antonio
    Weisz, Giora
    Latib, Azeem
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2018, 5
  • [10] The Pros and Cons of Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Eltchaninoff, Helene
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (20) : 2134 - 2136