Reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire in adults with burns

被引:8
|
作者
Willemse, Heidi [1 ,2 ]
Geenen, Rinie [2 ]
Van Loey, Nancy E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Dutch Burn Ctr, POB 1015, NL-1940 EA Beverwijk, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Clin Psychol, POB 80140, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Stigmatization; Validity; Burn injuries; Depression; Invalidation; Body image; COMFORT QUESTIONNAIRE; FIT INDEXES; INVALIDATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2020.11.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Burn scars can attract attention from others which can be perceived as stigmatizing behavior with negative psychological consequences. The Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire (PSQ) is a validated instrument measuring the perception of stigmatization in burn survivors. The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the PSQ, specifically its factor structure, reliability, and associations with other relevant constructs. Method: Patients (N = 220) completed the PSQ at 3 months after burn. The factor structure was examined with explorative (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses at 3 and 12 months after burn, and reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha. Three months measurements were used to examine associations of the PSQ with 'depressive mood' (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI-II), 'interpersonal relations' and 'body image' (Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief, BSHS-B), and two scales of the Illness Invalidation Inventory (3*I). Results: A four factor model showed the best fit to the data. Two factors, 'confused/staring behavior' and 'hostile behavior', were identical to the original PSQ. The third original factor, 'absence of friendly behavior', was now divided into two factors separating absence of friendly behavior of strangers and other people. Internal consistency ranged from .60 to .88. Especially the 'confused/staring behavior' factor was related to the other questionnaire scores. Conclusion: The current study shows acceptable reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of the PSQ in a 4-factor solution. Further research into measurement invariance across languages is recommended to establish a uniform multicultural instrument. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1381 / 1388
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability and Validity of the Smart Diet Canadian Version Questionnaire
    Wiens, Linda
    Schulzer, Michael
    Chen, Charlene
    Parinas, Karen
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2010, 110 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [42] Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders
    Tuz-Hrycyna, Natalia
    Rzepakowska, Anna
    Niemczyk, Kazimierz
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, : 799 - 807
  • [43] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of breathlessness beliefs questionnaire
    Gurses, Hulya Nilgun
    Saka, Seda
    Zeren, Melih
    Bayram, Mehmet
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (04) : 834 - 839
  • [44] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in Asthma
    cakmak, Aslihan
    Simsek, Senem
    Ince, Deniz Inal
    Saglam, Melda
    Kutukcue, Ebru Calik
    Yagli, Naciye Vardar
    Karakaya, Guel
    THORACIC RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 24 (04) : 194 - 201
  • [45] Reliability and Validity of the German Version of the Emotional Style Questionnaire
    Jekauc, Darko
    Muelberger, Lea
    Weyland, Susanne
    Ennigkeit, Fabienne
    Wunsch, Kathrin
    Krell-Roesch, Janina
    Fritsch, Julian
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [46] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A PERSIAN VERSION OF THE CHILDHOOD TRAUMA QUESTIONNAIRE
    Garrusi, Behshid
    Nakhaee, Nouzar
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2009, 104 (02) : 509 - 516
  • [47] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS QUESTIONNAIRE
    SAHIN, NH
    SAHIN, N
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 48 (03) : 334 - 340
  • [48] Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire
    Jon, Duk-In
    Hong, Narei
    Yoon, Bo-Hyun
    Jung, Han Yong
    Ha, Kyooseob
    Shin, Young Chul
    Bahk, Won-Myong
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 50 (03) : 286 - 291
  • [49] An Arabic version of the study process questionnaire: Reliability and validity
    Albaili, MA
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1995, 77 (03) : 1083 - 1089
  • [50] Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire
    Jérôme R. Lechien
    Luigi A. Vaira
    Serge D. Le Bon
    Roxane Geerts
    Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo
    Sven Saussez
    Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 51