Reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire in adults with burns

被引:8
|
作者
Willemse, Heidi [1 ,2 ]
Geenen, Rinie [2 ]
Van Loey, Nancy E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Dutch Burn Ctr, POB 1015, NL-1940 EA Beverwijk, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Clin Psychol, POB 80140, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Stigmatization; Validity; Burn injuries; Depression; Invalidation; Body image; COMFORT QUESTIONNAIRE; FIT INDEXES; INVALIDATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2020.11.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Burn scars can attract attention from others which can be perceived as stigmatizing behavior with negative psychological consequences. The Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire (PSQ) is a validated instrument measuring the perception of stigmatization in burn survivors. The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the PSQ, specifically its factor structure, reliability, and associations with other relevant constructs. Method: Patients (N = 220) completed the PSQ at 3 months after burn. The factor structure was examined with explorative (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses at 3 and 12 months after burn, and reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha. Three months measurements were used to examine associations of the PSQ with 'depressive mood' (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI-II), 'interpersonal relations' and 'body image' (Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief, BSHS-B), and two scales of the Illness Invalidation Inventory (3*I). Results: A four factor model showed the best fit to the data. Two factors, 'confused/staring behavior' and 'hostile behavior', were identical to the original PSQ. The third original factor, 'absence of friendly behavior', was now divided into two factors separating absence of friendly behavior of strangers and other people. Internal consistency ranged from .60 to .88. Especially the 'confused/staring behavior' factor was related to the other questionnaire scores. Conclusion: The current study shows acceptable reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of the PSQ in a 4-factor solution. Further research into measurement invariance across languages is recommended to establish a uniform multicultural instrument. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1381 / 1388
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire
    Wu, Qing
    Guo, AiMin
    Zhao, YanWei
    Li, Sijia
    Huang, Hui
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2018, 15 (02) : 114 - 122
  • [32] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire
    Erdogan, Sengul
    Ucpunar, Habibe K.
    Cangoz Tavat, Banu
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2022, 33 (04) : 274 - 279
  • [33] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire
    Lin, Chuan-Ju
    Shiah, I-Shin
    Chu, Hsin
    Tsai, Pei-Shan
    Chen, Chiung-Hua
    Chang, Yue-Cune
    Chou, Kuei-Ru
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2011, 25 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [34] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Parenting Concerns Questionnaire
    Yanai, Misa
    Aoyama, Maho
    Kosugi, Kazuhiro
    Tsumura, Akemi
    Nakanishi, Erika
    Miyashita, Mitsunori
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 54 (07) : 797 - 804
  • [35] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
    Sar, Vedat
    Ozturk, Erdinc
    Ikikardes, Eda
    TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2012, 32 (04): : 1054 - 1063
  • [36] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
    S. Sarmer
    S. Ergin
    G. Yavuzer
    Rheumatology International, 2000, 20 : 9 - 12
  • [37] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Postmenopause Sexuality Questionnaire
    Kurne, Hatice Gulsah
    Akbayrak, Turkan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 165 (01) : 188 - 193
  • [38] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire
    Atar, Sevgi
    Atar, Yavuz
    Ilgin, Can
    Uygan, Ugur
    Demirhan, Esma
    Anarat, Melis Ece Arkan
    Tutar, Belgin
    Sari, Huseyin
    Berkiten, Guler
    Kuru, Omer
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2022, 31 (04) : 1726 - 1735
  • [39] Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of Child Health Questionnaire
    Norrby, U
    Nordholm, L
    Fasth, A
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 32 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [40] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE PAEDIATRIC VOLITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE - CHINESE VERSION
    Liu, Li-Ting
    Pan, Ay-Woan
    Chung, Lylnn
    Gau, Susan Shur-Fen
    Kramer, Jessica
    Lai, Jin-Shei
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (01) : 99 - 104