Blockchain for Environmental Governance: Can Smart Contracts Reinforce Payments for Ecosystem Services in Namibia?

被引:16
|
作者
Oberhauser, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2019年 / 2卷
关键词
blockchain; smart contract; oracle; land cover classification; payments for ecosystem services; community-based natural resource management; MOBILE PHONE COMMUNICATION; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; CONFLICT; IMPACTS; PROGRAM; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/fbloc.2019.00021
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Global South harbors some of the planet's most precious natural resources and is hence key in addressing the pressing environmental challenges of the Anthropocene. Here, payments for ecosystem services (PES) have recently gained importance as a means of environmental governance, increasingly complementing conventional command-and-control approaches. For instance, climate change is now mitigated through carbon offset payments and biodiversity loss is addressed through wildlife conservation performance payments. However, such payment schemes in the Global South face numerous challenges as identified by a large body of literature. This paper investigates if blockchain technology can help address some of the challenges by reinforcing PES programs with tamper-proof blockchain smart contracts. To this end, the paper presents a proof-of-concept of a blockchain-based wildlife conservation performance payments scheme in Namibia: the habitat integrity of an elephant corridor is assessed by remote sensing algorithms, which in turn trigger fictitious blockchain smart contract payments to surrounding communities. The application allows to practically discuss the potential of blockchain technology regarding three key aspects of PES: (i) effectiveness (conditionality) of environmental monitoring (ii) efficiency and transaction costs, as well as (iii) equity and benefit distribution. The case presented here is an example for linking the digital Blockchain sphere to practical challenges of natural resource management in the physical world. As such, it illustrates some potentials of the technology, but also shows how Blockchain technology is unlikely to provide transformative solutions in geographies with complex environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance
    Robertson, MM
    GEOFORUM, 2004, 35 (03) : 361 - 373
  • [42] Ecosystem Services and Environmental Governance: Comparing China and the U.S.
    Costanza, Robert
    Liu, Shuang
    ASIA & THE PACIFIC POLICY STUDIES, 2014, 1 (01): : 160 - 170
  • [43] Consortium Blockchain Smart Contracts for Musical Rights Governance in a Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) Use Case
    Kapsoulis, Nikolaos
    Psychas, Alexandros
    Palaiokrassas, Georgios
    Marinakis, Achilleas
    Litke, Antonios
    Varvarigou, Theodora
    Bouchlis, Charalampos
    Raouzaiou, Amaryllis
    Calvo, Goncal
    Escudero Subirana, Jordi
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2020, 12 (08):
  • [44] Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: What scope for payments for environmental services?
    Wertz-Kanounnikoff, Sheila
    Locatelli, Bruno
    Wunder, Sven
    Brockhaus, Maria
    CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 3 (02) : 143 - 158
  • [45] Can Financial Technology Innovate Benefit Distribution in Payments for Ecosystem Services and REDD plus ?
    Thompson, Benjamin S.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 139 : 150 - 157
  • [46] Determinants of the environmental conservation and poverty alleviation objectives of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs
    Ola, Oreoluwa
    Menapace, Luisa
    Benjamin, Emmanuel
    Lang, Hannes
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 35 : 52 - 66
  • [47] How an Australian Centre for Disease Control Can Reinforce Environmental Health Systems and Services
    Ryan, Benjamin J.
    Williams, James
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 85 (07) : 42 - 45
  • [48] Action- or results-based payments for ecosystem services in the era of smart weeding robots?
    Massfeller, Anna
    Zingsheim, Marie
    Ahmadi, Alireza
    Martinsson, Elin
    Storm, Hugo
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2025, 302
  • [49] Identifying payments for ecosystem services participants through social or spatial targeting? Exploring the outcomes of group level contracts
    McGrath, Francesca L.
    Leimona, Beria
    Amaruzaman, Sacha
    Rahadian, Nana P.
    Carrasco, Luis R.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 1 (07)
  • [50] Payments for ecosystem services within the hybrid governance model: evaluating policy alignment and complementarity on California rangelands
    Biggs, Nicole Buckley
    Hafner, Jayce
    Mashiri, Fadzayi E.
    Huntsinger, Lynn
    Lambin, Eric F.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (01):