Blockchain for Environmental Governance: Can Smart Contracts Reinforce Payments for Ecosystem Services in Namibia?

被引:16
|
作者
Oberhauser, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2019年 / 2卷
关键词
blockchain; smart contract; oracle; land cover classification; payments for ecosystem services; community-based natural resource management; MOBILE PHONE COMMUNICATION; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; CONFLICT; IMPACTS; PROGRAM; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/fbloc.2019.00021
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Global South harbors some of the planet's most precious natural resources and is hence key in addressing the pressing environmental challenges of the Anthropocene. Here, payments for ecosystem services (PES) have recently gained importance as a means of environmental governance, increasingly complementing conventional command-and-control approaches. For instance, climate change is now mitigated through carbon offset payments and biodiversity loss is addressed through wildlife conservation performance payments. However, such payment schemes in the Global South face numerous challenges as identified by a large body of literature. This paper investigates if blockchain technology can help address some of the challenges by reinforcing PES programs with tamper-proof blockchain smart contracts. To this end, the paper presents a proof-of-concept of a blockchain-based wildlife conservation performance payments scheme in Namibia: the habitat integrity of an elephant corridor is assessed by remote sensing algorithms, which in turn trigger fictitious blockchain smart contract payments to surrounding communities. The application allows to practically discuss the potential of blockchain technology regarding three key aspects of PES: (i) effectiveness (conditionality) of environmental monitoring (ii) efficiency and transaction costs, as well as (iii) equity and benefit distribution. The case presented here is an example for linking the digital Blockchain sphere to practical challenges of natural resource management in the physical world. As such, it illustrates some potentials of the technology, but also shows how Blockchain technology is unlikely to provide transformative solutions in geographies with complex environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Blockchain-based smart contracts as new governance tools for the sharing economy
    Fiorentino, Stefania
    Bartolucci, Silvia
    CITIES, 2021, 117
  • [22] Struggles for recognitional justice through payments for ecosystem services contracts in Ecuador's Andes
    Joslin, Audrey
    GEOFORUM, 2023, 145
  • [23] Surveying views on Payments for Ecosystem Services: Implications for environmental management and research
    Waylen, Kerry A.
    Martin-Ortega, Julia
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 29 : 23 - 30
  • [24] Ecosystem services from tropical savannas: economic opportunities through payments for environmental services
    Greiner, Romy
    Gordon, Iain
    Cocklin, Chris
    RANGELAND JOURNAL, 2009, 31 (01): : 51 - 59
  • [25] Monetization of Services Provided by Public Fog Nodes Using Blockchain and Smart Contracts
    Debe, Mazin
    Salah, Khaled
    Rehman, Muhammad Habib Ur
    Svetinovic, Davor
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 20118 - 20128
  • [26] Implementation of Smart Contracts based on Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain for the Purpose of Insurance Services
    Aleksieva, Veneta
    Valchanov, Hristo
    Huliyan, Anton
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL INNOVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS (BIA 2020), 2020, : 112 - 115
  • [27] Blockchain, tokens, smart contracts, and "decentralized autonomous organization": Expanding and renewing the mechanisms of governance?
    Chambefort, Cyril
    Chaudey, Magali
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 21 (03) : 511 - 515
  • [28] Can environmental services payments sustain collaborative forest management?
    School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States
    不详
    J. Sustainable For., 2006, 2 (63-79):
  • [29] Achieving Groundwater Governance: Ostrom's Design Principles and Payments for Ecosystem Services Approaches
    Nsoh, Walters
    TRANSNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2022, 11 (02) : 381 - 406
  • [30] Governing Forest Ecosystem Services for Sustainable Environmental Governance: A Review
    Adhikari, Shankar
    Baral, Himlal
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2018, 5 (05): : 1 - 13