Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint Analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Karolinczak, Beata [1 ]
Dabrowski, Wojciech [2 ]
Zylka, Radoslaw [3 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Technol, Fac Bldg Serv Hydro & Environm Engn, PL-00653 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Bialystok Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn & Environm Sci, 45E Wiejska St, PL-15351 Bialystok, Poland
[3] Bielmlek Dairy Cooperat, Wojska Polskiego 52, PL-17100 Bielsk Podlaski, Poland
关键词
dairy WWTP; activated sludge; sewage sludge management; anaerobic and aerobic stabilisation; carbon footprint; greenhouse gases emissions; energy; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; SLUDGE TREATMENT; METHANE; BALANCE; PLANTS;
D O I
10.3390/en14175366
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Modernisation of municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) should be carried out, taking into account its impact on global warming, e.g., through carbon footprint (CF) analysis. An important industrial sector in Poland is the dairy industry. In dairy WWTPs, the aerobic sewage sludge stabilisation applied thus far is being replaced by the anaerobic process. This change is positive due to the possibility of energy production, but it is unclear how it affects greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. The aim of the research was to perform CF analysis for two scenarios of dairy WWTP operation. The analysis was based on the real operating data of the current system (current scenario) and project of its modernisation (alternative scenario). The current scenario consists of mechanical and dissolved air flotation (DAF) treatment, biological treatment in sequence batch reactors (SBRs), aerobic sewage sludge stabilisation and its final farmland usage. The alternative scenario assumes replacing aerobic stabilisation with anaerobic stabilisation and a combined heat and power (CHP) system. The CF calculations were based on empirical models, taking into account different emission input parameters, expressed in CO2 equivalents (CO2e). The total CF of the current scenario was 22 kg CO2e PE-1 year(-1), while the alternative was 45 kg CO2e PE-1 year(-1). The largest share in the current scenario belongs to emissions from WWTPs and energy use, while in the alternative, there is the addition of emissions from biogas use.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of wastewater treatment plant technology on power consumption and carbon footprint
    Robescu, Lacramioara Diana
    Boncescu, Corina
    Bondrea, Dana Andreya
    Presura-Chirilescu, Elena
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT (CIEM), 2019, : 524 - 528
  • [32] A study on the carbon footprint contributions from a large wastewater treatment plant
    Boiocchi, Riccardo
    Viotti, Paolo
    Lancione, Davide
    Stracqualursi, Nicoletta
    Torretta, Vincenzo
    Ragazzi, Marco
    Ionescu, Gabriela
    Rada, Elena Cristina
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 : 274 - 286
  • [33] Carbon footprint assessment of water and wastewater treatment works in Scottish islands
    Gupta, Rohit
    Lee, Susan
    Lui, Jade
    Sloan, William T.
    You, Siming
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 450
  • [34] Dairy's Carbon Footprint and Sustainability
    Mitloehner, Frank M.
    ADVANCES IN DAIRY TECHNOLOGY, VOL 24, 2012, 24 : 347 - 350
  • [35] A comprehensive framework for eco-environmental impact evaluation of wastewater treatment plants: Integrating carbon footprint, energy footprint, toxicity, and economic assessments
    Abyar, Hajar
    Nowrouzi, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 348
  • [36] Integrated treatment of food waste with wastewater and sewage sludge: Energy and carbon footprint analysis with economic implications
    Iqbal, Asad
    Zan, Feixiang
    Siddiqui, Muhammad Ahmar
    Nizamuddin, Sabzoi
    Chen, Guanghao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 825
  • [37] Conventional and zero liquid discharge treatment plants for textile wastewater through the lens of carbon footprint analysis
    Mohan, S.
    Oke, Ninad
    Gokul, D.
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 12 (05) : 1392 - 1403
  • [38] Regional carbon footprint analysis of dairy feeds for milk production in the USA
    Felix Adom
    Ashley Maes
    Charles Workman
    Zara Clayton-Nierderman
    Greg Thoma
    David Shonnard
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 520 - 534
  • [39] Regional carbon footprint analysis of dairy feeds for milk production in the USA
    Adom, Felix
    Maes, Ashley
    Workman, Charles
    Clayton-Nierderman, Zara
    Thoma, Greg
    Shonnard, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (05): : 520 - 534
  • [40] Carbon footprint analysis of dairy feed from a mill in Michigan, USA
    Adom, Felix
    Workman, Charles
    Thoma, Greg
    Shonnard, David
    INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2013, 31 : S21 - S28